The Danish healthcare system: universalism for all?

This article examines the principle of universalism in the Danish healthcare system, as mandated by the Health Act’s requirement of “easy and equal access.” Drawing on welfare state theory, the authors develop a four-dimensional framework for analyzing universalism in healthcare: financing, access, consumption, and outcomes. Through an empirical assessment of developments in each dimension since 2000, the article shows that while financing and formal access remain largely universal, significant and increasing social and geographical inequalities persist in actual healthcare use and outcomes. These disparities are linked to political priorities, systemic constraints, and the inherent tension between competing policy goals such as quality, choice, and efficiency. The article argues that achieving greater equity in healthcare requires prioritization and targeted redistribution, which is politically challenging due to potential resistance from resourceful groups. The recent 2024 health reform is discussed as a partial response to these structural challenges.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Politica
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v57i3.159458
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Danish healthcare system: universalism for all?

Peter Bjerre Mortensen, Carsten Jensen
Politica
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
article

The Danish healthcare system: universalism for all?

Peter Bjerre Mortensen, Carsten Jensen
article en

Abstract

This article examines the principle of universalism in the Danish healthcare system, as mandated by the Health Act’s requirement of “easy and equal access.” Drawing on welfare state theory, the authors develop a four-dimensional framework for analyzing universalism in healthcare: financing, access, consumption, and outcomes. Through an empirical assessment of developments in each dimension since 2000, the article shows that while financing and formal access remain largely universal, significant and increasing social and geographical inequalities persist in actual healthcare use and outcomes. These disparities are linked to political priorities, systemic constraints, and the inherent tension between competing policy goals such as quality, choice, and efficiency. The article argues that achieving greater equity in healthcare requires prioritization and targeted redistribution, which is politically challenging due to potential resistance from resourceful groups. The recent 2024 health reform is discussed as a partial response to these structural challenges.

PoliticaVol. 57(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Danish healthcare system: universalism for all? — Peter Bjerre Mortensen, Carsten Jensen · Politica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS