The end of the ‘consociational mood’? Generational differences in sense-making of regionalization among Belgian Dutch-speakers

Regionalization has become increasingly salient for citizens. To assess whether citizens perceive regionalization as legitimate, studies have focused on understanding public opinion towards power devolution. Yet, few have considered regionalization as a self-reinforcing driver of public opinion. Drawing on the literature of policy feedback, the paper argues that the political narrative justifying the large-scale redefinition of the state has had a lasting, socializing effect on how citizens make sense of regionalization, known as normative policy feedback. To empirically demonstrate this mechanism, the paper explores sense-making of Dutch-speaking citizens in Belgium. Through inter-generational comparison it finds a fading consociational mood among participants socialized in a federal Belgium. In contrast, participants socialized in pre-federal Belgium continue to believe in the necessity of protecting language rights and segmental autonomy. The article thus shows that while participants support regionalization, they have qualitatively different normative assumptions regarding its purpose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional & Federal Studies
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2025.2548495
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The end of the ‘consociational mood’? Generational differences in sense-making of regionalization among Belgian Dutch-speakers

Ann-Mireille Sautter
Regional & Federal Studies
Political Systems and Governance
article

The end of the ‘consociational mood’? Generational differences in sense-making of regionalization among Belgian Dutch-speakers

Ann-Mireille Sautter
article en

Abstract

Regionalization has become increasingly salient for citizens. To assess whether citizens perceive regionalization as legitimate, studies have focused on understanding public opinion towards power devolution. Yet, few have considered regionalization as a self-reinforcing driver of public opinion. Drawing on the literature of policy feedback, the paper argues that the political narrative justifying the large-scale redefinition of the state has had a lasting, socializing effect on how citizens make sense of regionalization, known as normative policy feedback. To empirically demonstrate this mechanism, the paper explores sense-making of Dutch-speaking citizens in Belgium. Through inter-generational comparison it finds a fading consociational mood among participants socialized in a federal Belgium. In contrast, participants socialized in pre-federal Belgium continue to believe in the necessity of protecting language rights and segmental autonomy. The article thus shows that while participants support regionalization, they have qualitatively different normative assumptions regarding its purpose.

Regional & Federal Studies
Fund for Scientific Research (BE), Faculdades Guarulhos (BR), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Concordia University
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Political Systems and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.