Human Capital Exiting Capitol Hill? Differences in Congressional Staff Turnover by Race and Gender

ABSTRACT Congress relies heavily on congressional staff to function and, as such, members have raised alarms about staff departures and their impact on the institution's capacity. We examine patterns of congressional staff exit to understand the severity of this problem. We document differences in departure rates among staff from certain demographic groups, as staff diversity shapes substantive representation. Using comprehensive congressional staffing employment data over the past two decades, we show turnover rates vary by race and gender, with minorities more likely to exit their positions and women, despite being less likely to be promoted, more likely to stay. Lastly, while overall turnover rates are high, we find that staff with higher education and committee experience (whose departures are more likely to affect brain drain) are more likely to remain in Congress. These results hold important implications for ongoing policy reforms and for descriptive representation in congressional policymaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70030
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Capital Exiting Capitol Hill? Differences in Congressional Staff Turnover by Race and Gender

Hans J. G. Hassell, Alexander Bolton, Joshua McCrain
1 links
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Human Capital Exiting Capitol Hill? Differences in Congressional Staff Turnover by Race and Gender

Hans J. G. Hassell, Alexander Bolton, Joshua McCrain
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Congress relies heavily on congressional staff to function and, as such, members have raised alarms about staff departures and their impact on the institution's capacity. We examine patterns of congressional staff exit to understand the severity of this problem. We document differences in departure rates among staff from certain demographic groups, as staff diversity shapes substantive representation. Using comprehensive congressional staffing employment data over the past two decades, we show turnover rates vary by race and gender, with minorities more likely to exit their positions and women, despite being less likely to be promoted, more likely to stay. Lastly, while overall turnover rates are high, we find that staff with higher education and committee experience (whose departures are more likely to affect brain drain) are more likely to remain in Congress. These results hold important implications for ongoing policy reforms and for descriptive representation in congressional policymaking.

Legislative Studies QuarterlyVol. 50(4)
Florida State University (US), Emory University (US), University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human Capital Exiting Capitol Hill? Differences in Congressional Staff Turnover by Race and Gender — Hans J. G. Hassell, Alexander Bolton, et al. · Legislative Studies Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS