Unworthy yet Deserving: the Policy Implications of Elite Perceptions of Poverty in Israel in the 1960s and 1970s

This study examines how policy elites’ perceptions shape social policies related to poverty, focusing on the concepts of deservingness and worthiness. Using the development of the Israeli child benefit system in the 1960s and 1970s, it examines how policy elites morally evaluated and defined the poor, particularly large families. Using content and critical discourse analyses of parliamentary debates, the study examines theoretical models of deservingness and worthiness and uncovers contradictions between these ideas. Paradoxically, large families were seen as deserving because of their role in nation-building, but morally unworthy because they deviated from social norms. The results question the conventional overlap between deservingness and worthiness and show that social constructions of poverty can be both complex and contradictory. The study concludes with a discussion of wider implications for social policy, emphasising the importance of socio-cultural and political contexts in the distribution based on deservingness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Policy Practice and Research
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-025-00125-3
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unworthy yet Deserving: the Policy Implications of Elite Perceptions of Poverty in Israel in the 1960s and 1970s

Shiran Tayeb Elmakias
Journal of Policy Practice and Research
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

Unworthy yet Deserving: the Policy Implications of Elite Perceptions of Poverty in Israel in the 1960s and 1970s

Shiran Tayeb Elmakias
article en

Abstract

This study examines how policy elites’ perceptions shape social policies related to poverty, focusing on the concepts of deservingness and worthiness. Using the development of the Israeli child benefit system in the 1960s and 1970s, it examines how policy elites morally evaluated and defined the poor, particularly large families. Using content and critical discourse analyses of parliamentary debates, the study examines theoretical models of deservingness and worthiness and uncovers contradictions between these ideas. Paradoxically, large families were seen as deserving because of their role in nation-building, but morally unworthy because they deviated from social norms. The results question the conventional overlap between deservingness and worthiness and show that social constructions of poverty can be both complex and contradictory. The study concludes with a discussion of wider implications for social policy, emphasising the importance of socio-cultural and political contexts in the distribution based on deservingness.

Journal of Policy Practice and ResearchVol. 6(4)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.