Comparison of segmentation performance of cnns, vision transformers, and hybrid networks for paranasal sinuses with sinusitis on CT images

Accurate segmentation of the paranasal sinuses, including the frontal sinus (FS), ethmoid sinus (ES), sphenoid sinus (SS), and maxillary sinus (MS), plays an important role in supporting image-guided surgery (IGS) for sinusitis, facilitating safer intraoperative navigation by identifying anatomical variations and delineating surgical landmarks on CT imaging. To the best of our knowledge, no comparative studies of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), vision transformers (ViTs), and hybrid networks for segmenting each paranasal sinus in patients with sinusitis have been conducted. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the segmentation performance of CNNs, ViTs, and hybrid networks for individual paranasal sinuses with varying degrees of anatomical complexity and morphological and textural variations caused by sinusitis on CT images. The performance of CNNs, ViTs, and hybrid networks was compared using Jaccard Index (JI), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision (PR), recall (RC), and 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) for segmentation accuracy metrics and the number of parameters (Params) and inference time (IT) for computational efficiency. The Swin UNETR hybrid network outperformed the other networks, achieving the highest segmentation scores, with a JI of 0.719, a DSC of 0.830, a PR of 0.935, and a RC of 0.758, and the lowest HD95 value of 10.529 with the smallest number of the model architectural parameter, with 15.705 M Params. Also, CoTr, another hybrid network, demonstrated superior segmentation performance compared to CNNs and ViTs, and achieved the fastest inference time with 0.149 IT. Compared with CNNs and ViTs, hybrid networks significantly reduced false positives and enabled more precise boundary delineation, effectively capturing anatomical relationships among the sinuses and surrounding structures. This resulted in the lowest segmentation errors near critical surgical landmarks. In conclusion, hybrid networks may provide a more balanced trade-off between segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency, with potential applicability in clinical decision support systems for sinusitis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17266-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of segmentation performance of cnns, vision transformers, and hybrid networks for paranasal sinuses with sinusitis on CT images

Won-Jin Yi, Seon-Tae Kim, Daniel Y. Song, Kwang Gi Kim et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
1.85
article

Comparison of segmentation performance of cnns, vision transformers, and hybrid networks for paranasal sinuses with sinusitis on CT images

Won-Jin Yi, Seon-Tae Kim, Daniel Y. Song, Kwang Gi Kim, Jeongsu Han, Su Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of the paranasal sinuses, including the frontal sinus (FS), ethmoid sinus (ES), sphenoid sinus (SS), and maxillary sinus (MS), plays an important role in supporting image-guided surgery (IGS) for sinusitis, facilitating safer intraoperative navigation by identifying anatomical variations and delineating surgical landmarks on CT imaging. To the best of our knowledge, no comparative studies of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), vision transformers (ViTs), and hybrid networks for segmenting each paranasal sinus in patients with sinusitis have been conducted. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the segmentation performance of CNNs, ViTs, and hybrid networks for individual paranasal sinuses with varying degrees of anatomical complexity and morphological and textural variations caused by sinusitis on CT images. The performance of CNNs, ViTs, and hybrid networks was compared using Jaccard Index (JI), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision (PR), recall (RC), and 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) for segmentation accuracy metrics and the number of parameters (Params) and inference time (IT) for computational efficiency. The Swin UNETR hybrid network outperformed the other networks, achieving the highest segmentation scores, with a JI of 0.719, a DSC of 0.830, a PR of 0.935, and a RC of 0.758, and the lowest HD95 value of 10.529 with the smallest number of the model architectural parameter, with 15.705 M Params. Also, CoTr, another hybrid network, demonstrated superior segmentation performance compared to CNNs and ViTs, and achieved the fastest inference time with 0.149 IT. Compared with CNNs and ViTs, hybrid networks significantly reduced false positives and enabled more precise boundary delineation, effectively capturing anatomical relationships among the sinuses and surrounding structures. This resulted in the lowest segmentation errors near critical surgical landmarks. In conclusion, hybrid networks may provide a more balanced trade-off between segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency, with potential applicability in clinical decision support systems for sinusitis.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Gachon University (KR), Seoul National University (KR), Gachon University Gil Hospital (KR), Seoul National University Dental Hospital (KR)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
1.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.