Performance differences in lifeboat launching procedures between IVR training and traditional practical lessons in maritime safety education

Abstract This research investigated the potential improvement of IVR on procedural practical knowledge in maritime safety education in a lifeboat case study. Participants were divided into three groups: a VR, control and VR+ group. A practical test exam with a real lifeboat was conducted to evaluate the differences in number of students passed/failed and overall performances in the execution of lifeboat launching procedures between groups. There was no evidence that the VR students had a higher success rate than students in the control group in correctly and safely performing a lifeboat drill. However, VR students’ overall performances on procedural correctness were significantly better than those of the control group, despite that the VR students never practiced with a physical lifeboat. Given the importance of safety in the maritime industry, it is worthwhile to further investigate to what extent IVR can provide a solution to the current limitations in maritime safety education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Navigation
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0373463325101136
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance differences in lifeboat launching procedures between IVR training and traditional practical lessons in maritime safety education

Andy De Meyer De Meyer, Geert Potters, Deirdre Luyckx, Inez Houben
1 links
Journal of Navigation
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Performance differences in lifeboat launching procedures between IVR training and traditional practical lessons in maritime safety education

Andy De Meyer De Meyer, Geert Potters, Deirdre Luyckx, Inez Houben
article en

Abstract

Abstract This research investigated the potential improvement of IVR on procedural practical knowledge in maritime safety education in a lifeboat case study. Participants were divided into three groups: a VR, control and VR+ group. A practical test exam with a real lifeboat was conducted to evaluate the differences in number of students passed/failed and overall performances in the execution of lifeboat launching procedures between groups. There was no evidence that the VR students had a higher success rate than students in the control group in correctly and safely performing a lifeboat drill. However, VR students’ overall performances on procedural correctness were significantly better than those of the control group, despite that the VR students never practiced with a physical lifeboat. Given the importance of safety in the maritime industry, it is worthwhile to further investigate to what extent IVR can provide a solution to the current limitations in maritime safety education.

Journal of NavigationVol. 78(2-3)
Antwerp Maritime Academy (BE), BH Consulting (Ireland) (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance differences in lifeboat launching procedures between IVR training and traditional practical lessons in maritime safety education — Andy De Meyer De Meyer, Geert Potters, et al. · Journal of Navigation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS