Obstetric outcomes after general anaesthesia for acute intra-abdominal pathology during pregnancy in a non-university teaching hospital: a retrospective cohort study

Background: Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy is required in approximately 0.4–1% of pregnant women and has been associated with adverse obstetric outcomes, such as preterm labour and low birth weight. However, these data originate from secondary and tertiary hospitals usually treating high-risk populations, hence potentially overestimating both incidence and risk. Objectives: To analyse the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes after general anaesthesia for acute intra-abdominal pathology during pregnancy in a non-university teaching hospital. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Non-university teaching hospital. Methods: Women delivering in 2000-2023 were retrospectively identified from surgical and birth registries. Exposed women received general anaesthesia during pregnancy for laparoscopy or laparotomy for appendicectomy, adnexal pathology, cholecystectomy, or diagnostic procedures. Unexposed women lacked this exposure. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to mitigate confounding by maternal age and parity. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was gestational age at delivery. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of surgery, birth weight, and the risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight, and caesarean section. Results: The study included 47 exposed and 470 unexposed women. Most exposed patients (96%) underwent a single anaesthetic exposure of 54 ± 23 minutes (mean ± standard deviation). For the primary outcome, no significant difference was observed (weighted mean difference: –0.48 weeks, 95% CI: –0.99 to 0.04; p = 0.0686). For the secondary outcomes, the unexposed group had a significantly lower risk of preterm delivery (weighted absolute risk reduction: 14.6%, 95% CI: 1.0–28.2%; p = 0.0359), however, significance was lost in sensitivity analysis. Other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly. 0.31% of patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery in the study centre were pregnant. Conclusions: This study found no robust evidence linking general anaesthesia for acute intra-abdominal pathology during pregnancy to adverse obstetric outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56126/76.3.26
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obstetric outcomes after general anaesthesia for acute intra-abdominal pathology during pregnancy in a non-university teaching hospital: a retrospective cohort study

G Schols, Tim Tollens, Tom Bleeser, Steffen Rex et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Obstetric outcomes after general anaesthesia for acute intra-abdominal pathology during pregnancy in a non-university teaching hospital: a retrospective cohort study

G Schols, Tim Tollens, Tom Bleeser, Steffen Rex, Jan Bosteels, Arjen Brenders, S Devroe, A Wallyn, P. van de Putte, A. Charlier, D Vanhaelewijck
article en

Abstract

Background: Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy is required in approximately 0.4–1% of pregnant women and has been associated with adverse obstetric outcomes, such as preterm labour and low birth weight. However, these data originate from secondary and tertiary hospitals usually treating high-risk populations, hence potentially overestimating both incidence and risk. Objectives: To analyse the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes after general anaesthesia for acute intra-abdominal pathology during pregnancy in a non-university teaching hospital. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Non-university teaching hospital. Methods: Women delivering in 2000-2023 were retrospectively identified from surgical and birth registries. Exposed women received general anaesthesia during pregnancy for laparoscopy or laparotomy for appendicectomy, adnexal pathology, cholecystectomy, or diagnostic procedures. Unexposed women lacked this exposure. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to mitigate confounding by maternal age and parity. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was gestational age at delivery. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of surgery, birth weight, and the risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight, and caesarean section. Results: The study included 47 exposed and 470 unexposed women. Most exposed patients (96%) underwent a single anaesthetic exposure of 54 ± 23 minutes (mean ± standard deviation). For the primary outcome, no significant difference was observed (weighted mean difference: –0.48 weeks, 95% CI: –0.99 to 0.04; p = 0.0686). For the secondary outcomes, the unexposed group had a significantly lower risk of preterm delivery (weighted absolute risk reduction: 14.6%, 95% CI: 1.0–28.2%; p = 0.0359), however, significance was lost in sensitivity analysis. Other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly. 0.31% of patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery in the study centre were pregnant. Conclusions: This study found no robust evidence linking general anaesthesia for acute intra-abdominal pathology during pregnancy to adverse obstetric outcomes.

Acta Anaesthesiologica BelgicaVol. 76(3)
Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.