A ddPCR method for simultaneous detection and quantification of Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Bacillus cereus in foods

The traditional methods for the detection and quantification of foodborne bacteria are time-consuming with the potential for false negative pathogen-free results. Rapid and effective detection and quantification of foodborne pathogenic microorganisms are crucial in prevention and control of foodborne diseases. In the last decade, the technique of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) has been widely applied for the precise quantification of gene expression. The aim of this study is to establish a quadruplex ddPCR method to detect and quantify simultaneously four major bacterial pathogens, Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenesand Bacillus cereus, potentially co-existing in instant food. A strong linear correlation (r<sup>2</sup>>0.999) was observed in the ranges of 33-21500 copies/20µL for S. Typhi, 28-18400 copies/20µL for S. aureus, 25-27000 copies/20µL for L. monocytogenes and 15-15600 copies /20µL for B. cereus respectively. For this established ddPCR method, the lower detection limits were 8 copies/20µL (S. Typhi), 7 copies/20µL (S. aureus), 9 copies/20µL (L. monocytogenes) and 7 copies/20µL (B. cereus) respectively. For its evaluation this method was also compared in parallel with the plate counting method using the artificially contaminated food samples with the added pathogens mentioned above. Unpaired t-test showed the results from the two methods were not statistically different but the ddPCR method is superior to the plate counting method with shorter turnaround time, lower detection limit, and more robust reproducibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17272-y
Primary Topic
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A ddPCR method for simultaneous detection and quantification of Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Bacillus cereus in foods

Meidan Liang, Kai Chen, Zhishen Huang, Shanmei Zeng et al.
Scientific Reports
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
article

A ddPCR method for simultaneous detection and quantification of Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Bacillus cereus in foods

Meidan Liang, Kai Chen, Zhishen Huang, Shanmei Zeng, Jianbo Xiao, Xueqi Sun, Jieer Lao, Xiangmin Lin, Haiyan Wei
article en

Abstract

The traditional methods for the detection and quantification of foodborne bacteria are time-consuming with the potential for false negative pathogen-free results. Rapid and effective detection and quantification of foodborne pathogenic microorganisms are crucial in prevention and control of foodborne diseases. In the last decade, the technique of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) has been widely applied for the precise quantification of gene expression. The aim of this study is to establish a quadruplex ddPCR method to detect and quantify simultaneously four major bacterial pathogens, Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenesand Bacillus cereus, potentially co-existing in instant food. A strong linear correlation (r<sup>2</sup>>0.999) was observed in the ranges of 33-21500 copies/20µL for S. Typhi, 28-18400 copies/20µL for S. aureus, 25-27000 copies/20µL for L. monocytogenes and 15-15600 copies /20µL for B. cereus respectively. For this established ddPCR method, the lower detection limits were 8 copies/20µL (S. Typhi), 7 copies/20µL (S. aureus), 9 copies/20µL (L. monocytogenes) and 7 copies/20µL (B. cereus) respectively. For its evaluation this method was also compared in parallel with the plate counting method using the artificially contaminated food samples with the added pathogens mentioned above. Unpaired t-test showed the results from the two methods were not statistically different but the ddPCR method is superior to the plate counting method with shorter turnaround time, lower detection limit, and more robust reproducibility.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Electronic Arts (Canada) (CA), Guangzhou Quality Supervision, Inspection and Research Institute (CN), Dairy Innovation Australia (Australia) (AU)
Callaghan Innovation, Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.