Enhancing Margin Precision: A Work System Approach to Lumpectomies and Mastectomies

Achieving negative surgical margins is critical for patient outcomes in breast-conserving surgery (BCS), however positive margins require reoperation in 20% to 40% of cases currently. This study explores design criteria and current barriers and facilitators to margin definition and assessment as part of designing an intraoperative tool for margin assessment during BCS. We conducted observations of nine surgeries by four surgeons at a quaternary medical center. We analyzed the data using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to identify barriers and facilitators to margin assessment. We identified 38 barriers and 62 facilitators, which we inductively categorized into dimensions. The dimensions included teamwork, information display design, intraoperative tool use, and tissue characteristics. Teamwork was the most frequently observed dimension, followed by information display design and intraoperative tool use. This study provides insights to support the design of workflow-adaptive solutions and improve margin accuracy and surgical performance in breast oncology procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251369400
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Margin Precision: A Work System Approach to Lumpectomies and Mastectomies

Hamid Norasi, Abigail R. Wooldridge, M. Susan Hallbeck, Chihab Nadri et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Digital Imaging in Medicine
3.76
article

Enhancing Margin Precision: A Work System Approach to Lumpectomies and Mastectomies

Hamid Norasi, Abigail R. Wooldridge, M. Susan Hallbeck, Chihab Nadri, Mojgan Zoaktafi, Kaitlin Skurnak, Gavin Bourgeois
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Achieving negative surgical margins is critical for patient outcomes in breast-conserving surgery (BCS), however positive margins require reoperation in 20% to 40% of cases currently. This study explores design criteria and current barriers and facilitators to margin definition and assessment as part of designing an intraoperative tool for margin assessment during BCS. We conducted observations of nine surgeries by four surgeons at a quaternary medical center. We analyzed the data using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to identify barriers and facilitators to margin assessment. We identified 38 barriers and 62 facilitators, which we inductively categorized into dimensions. The dimensions included teamwork, information display design, intraoperative tool use, and tissue characteristics. Teamwork was the most frequently observed dimension, followed by information display design and intraoperative tool use. This study provides insights to support the design of workflow-adaptive solutions and improve margin accuracy and surgical performance in breast oncology procedures.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.