Using Certainty Factor as a Spatial Sample Filter for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: The Case of the Upper Jinsha River Region, Southeastern Tibetan Plateau

Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) faces persistent challenges in defining representative stable samples as conventional random selection often includes unstable areas, introducing spatial bias and compromising model accuracy. To address this, we redefine the certainty factor (CF) method—traditionally for factor weighting—as a spatial screening tool for stable zone delineation and apply it to the tectonically active upper Jinsha River (937 km2, southeastern Tibetan Plateau). Our approach first generates a preliminary susceptibility map via CF, using the natural breaks method to define low- and very low-susceptibility zones (CF < 0.1) as statistically stable regions. Non-landslide samples are exclusively selected from these zones for support vector machine (SVM) modeling with five-fold cross-validation. Key results: CF-guided sampling achieves training/testing AUC of 0.924/0.920, surpassing random sampling (0.882/0.878) by 4.8% and reducing ROC standard deviation by 32%. The final map shows 88.49% of known landslides concentrated in 25.70% of high/very high-susceptibility areas, aligning with geological controls (e.g., 92% of high-susceptibility units in soft lithologies within 500 m of faults). Despite using a simpler SVM, our framework outperforms advanced models (ANN: AUC, 0.890; RF: AUC, 0.870) in the same region, proving physical heuristic sample curation supersedes algorithmic complexity. This transferable framework embeds geological prior knowledge into machine learning, offering high-precision risk zoning for disaster mitigation in data-scarce mountainous regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14090339
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Certainty Factor as a Spatial Sample Filter for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: The Case of the Upper Jinsha River Region, Southeastern Tibetan Plateau

Xin Zhou, Ke Jin, Xiulei Li, Yiding Bao et al.
2 citations
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Landslides and related hazards
4.84
article

Using Certainty Factor as a Spatial Sample Filter for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: The Case of the Upper Jinsha River Region, Southeastern Tibetan Plateau

Xin Zhou, Ke Jin, Xiulei Li, Yiding Bao, Yunkai Ruan, Li Tang, Xiaohui Sun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) faces persistent challenges in defining representative stable samples as conventional random selection often includes unstable areas, introducing spatial bias and compromising model accuracy. To address this, we redefine the certainty factor (CF) method—traditionally for factor weighting—as a spatial screening tool for stable zone delineation and apply it to the tectonically active upper Jinsha River (937 km2, southeastern Tibetan Plateau). Our approach first generates a preliminary susceptibility map via CF, using the natural breaks method to define low- and very low-susceptibility zones (CF < 0.1) as statistically stable regions. Non-landslide samples are exclusively selected from these zones for support vector machine (SVM) modeling with five-fold cross-validation. Key results: CF-guided sampling achieves training/testing AUC of 0.924/0.920, surpassing random sampling (0.882/0.878) by 4.8% and reducing ROC standard deviation by 32%. The final map shows 88.49% of known landslides concentrated in 25.70% of high/very high-susceptibility areas, aligning with geological controls (e.g., 92% of high-susceptibility units in soft lithologies within 500 m of faults). Despite using a simpler SVM, our framework outperforms advanced models (ANN: AUC, 0.890; RF: AUC, 0.870) in the same region, proving physical heuristic sample curation supersedes algorithmic complexity. This transferable framework embeds geological prior knowledge into machine learning, offering high-precision risk zoning for disaster mitigation in data-scarce mountainous regions.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-InformationVol. 14(9)
Jilin University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment (CN), Changchun University (CN), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN), Chongqing Jiaotong University (CN), Taiyuan University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Landslides and related hazards
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.