An Inquiry into the Accessibility of Campus Recreation for College Students with Disabilities

University recreation centers are essential for college student physical activity, yet 68% of students with disabilities (SWD) use these facilities fewer than five times annually. Physical and programmatic barriers, including physical access and program inclusivity, may limit SWD participation. This study evaluated the accessibility of three campus recreation facilities at southeastern U.S. public universities using the AIMFREE assessment and interviews with campus recreation directors and staff. Results showed below-average accessibility (<50%) across half of AIMFREE sections, with policies, access routes, and professional training scoring the lowest (7–35%). Interviews revealed gaps in funding allocation, limited adapted programming, and insufficient inclusive marketing efforts. Staff also cited a lack of knowledge, training, and resources as significant barriers but expressed a commitment to addressing these challenges. Findings emphasize the need for tailored training programs that address the unique environmental and cultural contexts of campus recreation to improve accessibility and inclusivity for SWD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Recreational Sports Journal
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15588661251372108
Primary Topic
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Inquiry into the Accessibility of Campus Recreation for College Students with Disabilities

Kayla Abrahamson, Seán Healy, Eloise Elliott, Andrea Taliaferro et al.
Recreational Sports Journal
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
article

An Inquiry into the Accessibility of Campus Recreation for College Students with Disabilities

Kayla Abrahamson, Seán Healy, Eloise Elliott, Andrea Taliaferro, Melissa Sherfinski, Samantha M Ross-Cypcar
article en

Abstract

University recreation centers are essential for college student physical activity, yet 68% of students with disabilities (SWD) use these facilities fewer than five times annually. Physical and programmatic barriers, including physical access and program inclusivity, may limit SWD participation. This study evaluated the accessibility of three campus recreation facilities at southeastern U.S. public universities using the AIMFREE assessment and interviews with campus recreation directors and staff. Results showed below-average accessibility (<50%) across half of AIMFREE sections, with policies, access routes, and professional training scoring the lowest (7–35%). Interviews revealed gaps in funding allocation, limited adapted programming, and insufficient inclusive marketing efforts. Staff also cited a lack of knowledge, training, and resources as significant barriers but expressed a commitment to addressing these challenges. Findings emphasize the need for tailored training programs that address the unique environmental and cultural contexts of campus recreation to improve accessibility and inclusivity for SWD.

Recreational Sports JournalVol. 49(2)
West Virginia University (US), University of South Carolina (US), University of Utah (US), University of Limerick (IE), Education and Early Childhood Development (CA)
NIRSA Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.