The Role of the Judicial Presumption in Criminal Proof According to the Jordanian Code of Criminal Procedure

The judicial presumption is of great importance in criminal proof, because the truth cannot be reached without it. And it has a great value in proof in terms of strengthening other evidence on which the judge relies to form his emotional conviction. Rather, it is often the basis on which the judge balances the different evidence and evaluates the evidence before him in order to reach a fair judgment decision. Since the judicial presumption is not exclusively mentioned in the penal legislation, it is considered indirect evidence, but it is sufficient to establish the judge's conviction about the incident presented to him. Therefore, it was necessary to address this subject and shed light on all its aspects to determine its nature and to clarify its role in the criminal proof.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v4i1.1984
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of the Judicial Presumption in Criminal Proof According to the Jordanian Code of Criminal Procedure

Michel Haddad
Journal of Posthumanism
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

The Role of the Judicial Presumption in Criminal Proof According to the Jordanian Code of Criminal Procedure

Michel Haddad
article en

Abstract

The judicial presumption is of great importance in criminal proof, because the truth cannot be reached without it. And it has a great value in proof in terms of strengthening other evidence on which the judge relies to form his emotional conviction. Rather, it is often the basis on which the judge balances the different evidence and evaluates the evidence before him in order to reach a fair judgment decision. Since the judicial presumption is not exclusively mentioned in the penal legislation, it is considered indirect evidence, but it is sufficient to establish the judge's conviction about the incident presented to him. Therefore, it was necessary to address this subject and shed light on all its aspects to determine its nature and to clarify its role in the criminal proof.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 4(1)
Hashemite University (JO), Jerash University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of the Judicial Presumption in Criminal Proof According to the Jordanian Code of Criminal Procedure — Michel Haddad · Journal of Posthumanism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS