A nomogram for the prediction of response to anti-CGRP mAbs: the CGRP score

Real-world studies have explored potential predictors of response to anti-calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), though results have remained inconsistent. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are becoming increasingly relevant in migraine research, offering a data-driven approach to identifying predictors of response to preventive treatments. To maximize their potential, a clinically applicable and user-oriented framework is needed to promote the use of these algorithms in research and, eventually, as supportive tools in clinical practice. This prospective cohort study included adults with migraine treated with anti-CGRP mAbs (anti-ligand and receptor) at two headache centers. Responders were defined as patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs) at 12 months. A logistic regression model was trained (80%) and tested (20%) using 11 baseline variables, including age, sex, migraine subtype, medication overuse, MHDs, and disability scores. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. A nomogram was created for future research and clinical application. The model was then validated against an external test cohort treated with anti-CGRP mAbs. Among 429 patients, 310 completed twelve months of treatment, with 236 (55.0%) classified as responders. The external test set included 109 patients. The ML model achieved an overall average weighted F1-score of 70.5% between the two test sets, with good performance in identifying “responders” (precision: 0.75, recall: 0.84, F1-score: 0.79). The model yielded predictions with an overall accuracy of 74% when tested against an external test cohort. Chronic migraine status, older age, and lower baseline MHDs were associated with higher response likelihood. Medication overuse and frequent analgesic use were negatively associated with response. The nomogram provided a clinically interpretable tool to estimate response probability, providing a total score named “CGRP Score” (CGRP mAbs Global Response Prediction). This ML-based predictive score achieved a good performance in identifying responders to anti-CGRP mAbs. The nomogram has the potential to be a practical, user-friendly tool for supporting clinical decision-making after validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02138-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A nomogram for the prediction of response to anti-CGRP mAbs: the CGRP score

David García‐Azorín, Sonia Di Tella, Claudia Altamura, Catello Vollono et al.
2 citations
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
2.59
article

A nomogram for the prediction of response to anti-CGRP mAbs: the CGRP score

David García‐Azorín, Sonia Di Tella, Claudia Altamura, Catello Vollono, Luigi Francesco Iannone, Fabrizio Vernieri, Francesco De Cesaris, Giulia Vigani, Paolo Calabresi, Ammar Lokhandwala
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Real-world studies have explored potential predictors of response to anti-calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), though results have remained inconsistent. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are becoming increasingly relevant in migraine research, offering a data-driven approach to identifying predictors of response to preventive treatments. To maximize their potential, a clinically applicable and user-oriented framework is needed to promote the use of these algorithms in research and, eventually, as supportive tools in clinical practice. This prospective cohort study included adults with migraine treated with anti-CGRP mAbs (anti-ligand and receptor) at two headache centers. Responders were defined as patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs) at 12 months. A logistic regression model was trained (80%) and tested (20%) using 11 baseline variables, including age, sex, migraine subtype, medication overuse, MHDs, and disability scores. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. A nomogram was created for future research and clinical application. The model was then validated against an external test cohort treated with anti-CGRP mAbs. Among 429 patients, 310 completed twelve months of treatment, with 236 (55.0%) classified as responders. The external test set included 109 patients. The ML model achieved an overall average weighted F1-score of 70.5% between the two test sets, with good performance in identifying “responders” (precision: 0.75, recall: 0.84, F1-score: 0.79). The model yielded predictions with an overall accuracy of 74% when tested against an external test cohort. Chronic migraine status, older age, and lower baseline MHDs were associated with higher response likelihood. Medication overuse and frequent analgesic use were negatively associated with response. The nomogram provided a clinically interpretable tool to estimate response probability, providing a total score named “CGRP Score” (CGRP mAbs Global Response Prediction). This ML-based predictive score achieved a good performance in identifying responders to anti-CGRP mAbs. The nomogram has the potential to be a practical, user-friendly tool for supporting clinical decision-making after validation.

The Journal of Headache and PainVol. 26(1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Hospital Universitario Río Hortega (ES), University of Florence (IT), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.