Edinburgh Aortic Summit 2025

The Scottish dedicated aortic service was established in 2018.We present medium term survival outcomes for patients who have undergone a total aortic arch replacement procedure followed by either an open or endovascular second stage procedure to treat complex arch and thoracoabdominal aortic disease.Thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent either elective or emergency total arch replacement followed by a second stage procedure between 2018 and 2022 were included.These data were analysed using the R programming software.Survival analysis was performed through generation of Kaplan Meier curves, with censoring at either death or date of last follow-up.Taking the date of total arch replacement as day zero, open second stage repair had a one year survival of 93% and two year survival of 81%.Endovascular second stage repair had a one year survival of 87% and a 2 year survival of 80%.Median time between first and second stage repair was 203 days (IQR 72:311).In this cohort there is no evidence of a medium term survival difference between open and endovascular second stage procedure following total arch replacement p = 0.83.This small observational cohort has limitations, and significant confounding exists since surgical options were often influenced by underlying patient factors.These data add to an understanding of survival outcomes in a complex surgical domain.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03526-3
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Edinburgh Aortic Summit 2025

1 links
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

Edinburgh Aortic Summit 2025

article en

Abstract

The Scottish dedicated aortic service was established in 2018.We present medium term survival outcomes for patients who have undergone a total aortic arch replacement procedure followed by either an open or endovascular second stage procedure to treat complex arch and thoracoabdominal aortic disease.Thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent either elective or emergency total arch replacement followed by a second stage procedure between 2018 and 2022 were included.These data were analysed using the R programming software.Survival analysis was performed through generation of Kaplan Meier curves, with censoring at either death or date of last follow-up.Taking the date of total arch replacement as day zero, open second stage repair had a one year survival of 93% and two year survival of 81%.Endovascular second stage repair had a one year survival of 87% and a 2 year survival of 80%.Median time between first and second stage repair was 203 days (IQR 72:311).In this cohort there is no evidence of a medium term survival difference between open and endovascular second stage procedure following total arch replacement p = 0.83.This small observational cohort has limitations, and significant confounding exists since surgical options were often influenced by underlying patient factors.These data add to an understanding of survival outcomes in a complex surgical domain.

Journal of Cardiothoracic SurgeryVol. 20(S1)
University of Edinburgh, Institute of Genetics
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.