Cooperation, different faces of morality, and their links to risk, fear, and personality during a crisis

Morality-as-Cooperation theory posits that moral behaviour evolved to facilitate group cohesion and collective action. The COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the imposition and subsequent easing of strict regulations in Australia, presented a real-world test of this, where individual decisions had a significant impact on the collective. This study examines whether psychological profiles can predict cooperative behaviour in a crisis. 582 Australian adults were recruited via Prolific and surveyed twice between January and June 2022. Participants completed morality, risk-taking propensity, fears, personality, and behaviour measures. CFA identified morality and risk factors. Latent profile analysis (LPA) determined psychological and behavioural profiles. Three moral factors, Binding, Individualised, and Dark Morality (self-serving disengagement), emerged alongside a Risk Propensity factor. LPA revealed three classes: Amoral Risk-Seekers (~14 %) with high dark morality, high risk-taking, and low cooperation; Moral Risk-Averse (~55 %) with high cooperation and low dark morality; and Anxious Compliant (~31 %) with high fears and cooperation. Profiles differed in agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. These findings enhance our understanding of the psychology behind cooperation. They extend the Morality-as-Cooperation theory by incorporating personality and risk, offering a more nuanced and novel account of moral decision-making in crisis. The study offers practical insights for tailored interventions in future emergencies. • First to test Morality-as-Cooperation Theory with COVID-19 behavioural data • Introduced a Dark-Morality factor combining amorality, reactance, and chaos • Distinct clusters: amoral risk-seekers, moral risk-averse, and anxious-compliant • Linked clusters to personality, cognition, demographics, and compliance behaviours • Practical implications for predicting and managing real-life moral decisions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Individual Differences
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113426
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cooperation, different faces of morality, and their links to risk, fear, and personality during a crisis

Sabina Kleitman, Bruce D. Burns, Benjamin Kai Ni
Personality and Individual Differences
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Cooperation, different faces of morality, and their links to risk, fear, and personality during a crisis

Sabina Kleitman, Bruce D. Burns, Benjamin Kai Ni
article en

Abstract

Morality-as-Cooperation theory posits that moral behaviour evolved to facilitate group cohesion and collective action. The COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the imposition and subsequent easing of strict regulations in Australia, presented a real-world test of this, where individual decisions had a significant impact on the collective. This study examines whether psychological profiles can predict cooperative behaviour in a crisis. 582 Australian adults were recruited via Prolific and surveyed twice between January and June 2022. Participants completed morality, risk-taking propensity, fears, personality, and behaviour measures. CFA identified morality and risk factors. Latent profile analysis (LPA) determined psychological and behavioural profiles. Three moral factors, Binding, Individualised, and Dark Morality (self-serving disengagement), emerged alongside a Risk Propensity factor. LPA revealed three classes: Amoral Risk-Seekers (~14 %) with high dark morality, high risk-taking, and low cooperation; Moral Risk-Averse (~55 %) with high cooperation and low dark morality; and Anxious Compliant (~31 %) with high fears and cooperation. Profiles differed in agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. These findings enhance our understanding of the psychology behind cooperation. They extend the Morality-as-Cooperation theory by incorporating personality and risk, offering a more nuanced and novel account of moral decision-making in crisis. The study offers practical insights for tailored interventions in future emergencies. • First to test Morality-as-Cooperation Theory with COVID-19 behavioural data • Introduced a Dark-Morality factor combining amorality, reactance, and chaos • Distinct clusters: amoral risk-seekers, moral risk-averse, and anxious-compliant • Linked clusters to personality, cognition, demographics, and compliance behaviours • Practical implications for predicting and managing real-life moral decisions

Personality and Individual DifferencesVol. 247
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.