Auditing mechanisms to ensure effective public administration through justice: evidence from Classical Athens

Abstract In this article, we argue that the ancient Athenian democracy (508–323 BCE) developed a very efficient system of accountability of public magistrates. This was achieved through the introduction of a series of institutions that ensured that corruption in public administration could be combated very efficiently. The justice system was vital for the success of this accountability system. In cases of corruption, public officials were prosecuted, and the penalties were severe. In contrast, honest and efficient public magistrates were praised and rewarded with economic incentives. In ancient Athenian society, where direct democracy resulted in a high interaction amongst citizens, corrupt citizens were highly stigmatized—something that acted as deterrent for public magistrates. Being inspired by the Athenian paradigm regarding the management of public administration, we make some institutional proposals that, if properly applied, may improve the effectiveness of public administration in contemporary democracies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statute Law Review
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmaf027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditing mechanisms to ensure effective public administration through justice: evidence from Classical Athens

Emmanouil M. L. Economou, Nicholas C. Kyriazis
1 citations
Statute Law Review
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
3.13
article

Auditing mechanisms to ensure effective public administration through justice: evidence from Classical Athens

Emmanouil M. L. Economou, Nicholas C. Kyriazis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we argue that the ancient Athenian democracy (508–323 BCE) developed a very efficient system of accountability of public magistrates. This was achieved through the introduction of a series of institutions that ensured that corruption in public administration could be combated very efficiently. The justice system was vital for the success of this accountability system. In cases of corruption, public officials were prosecuted, and the penalties were severe. In contrast, honest and efficient public magistrates were praised and rewarded with economic incentives. In ancient Athenian society, where direct democracy resulted in a high interaction amongst citizens, corrupt citizens were highly stigmatized—something that acted as deterrent for public magistrates. Being inspired by the Athenian paradigm regarding the management of public administration, we make some institutional proposals that, if properly applied, may improve the effectiveness of public administration in contemporary democracies.

Statute Law ReviewVol. 46(3)
Economic Policy Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.