Food processing levels and processed food intake classification

A causal relationship between food processing and adverse health outcomes is often incorrectly reported. This is evidenced by several processed food classifications which mistakenly claim to categorize foods based on their processing level. Here we used chemical engineering principles to divide food processing to unit operations (physical processing) and unit processes (chemical processing) and established 5 food processing levels (FPL). Unit operations represent the lowest processing levels, FPL 0 and 1. Unit processes may include minor or major (bio)chemical changes resulting in FPL 2 and 3, respectively. FPL 4 is assigned to processing of food formulations with one or more ingredients from FPL 3 and 4. Foods from the different FPL are categorized with guidelines to corresponding processed food intake (PFI) classes, which provides improvements in comparison to the NOVA and other processed food classifications. The PFI classification combines processing and formulation as factors with possible but separate impact on nutritional, health and other outcomes of food intake. The concept of the FPL and PFI classification may be further expanded to indicate the impact of food processing in other applications, such as affordability and sustainability of food products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Foods
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100751
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food processing levels and processed food intake classification

Yrjö H. Roos
4 citations
Future Foods
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
7.51
article

Food processing levels and processed food intake classification

Yrjö H. Roos
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A causal relationship between food processing and adverse health outcomes is often incorrectly reported. This is evidenced by several processed food classifications which mistakenly claim to categorize foods based on their processing level. Here we used chemical engineering principles to divide food processing to unit operations (physical processing) and unit processes (chemical processing) and established 5 food processing levels (FPL). Unit operations represent the lowest processing levels, FPL 0 and 1. Unit processes may include minor or major (bio)chemical changes resulting in FPL 2 and 3, respectively. FPL 4 is assigned to processing of food formulations with one or more ingredients from FPL 3 and 4. Foods from the different FPL are categorized with guidelines to corresponding processed food intake (PFI) classes, which provides improvements in comparison to the NOVA and other processed food classifications. The PFI classification combines processing and formulation as factors with possible but separate impact on nutritional, health and other outcomes of food intake. The concept of the FPL and PFI classification may be further expanded to indicate the impact of food processing in other applications, such as affordability and sustainability of food products.

Future FoodsVol. 12
University College Cork (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
7.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Food processing levels and processed food intake classification — Yrjö H. Roos · Future Foods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS