Cinematic field of experiments: historical reality in the film “Captain Volkonogov Escaped” (2021)

This article examines the specificity of representing the past in contemporary cinema, in which the principle of strict realism is no longer absolute. In modern feature films, interpretations of historical events are constructed not on the basis of historiographical evidence, but through the deployment of cinema’s expressive resources. Consequently, the past is apprehended via the viewer’s visual perception of the constructed historical reality. Such films thus become distinctive documents of historical culture, prompting the development of new methodological approaches for their analysis as historical sources. Using "Captain Volkonogov Escaped" (2021), directed by N. Merkulova and A. Chupov, as a case study, the authors identify the cinematic strategies by which a historical reality is generated. The analysis integrates narrative, visual, and semiotic perspectives, focusing on the structuring of the film’s storytelling, the chromatic solutions, cinematographic and editing techniques, as well as the use of symbols and metaphors. The film’s departure from the realist method, its engagement with the theme of violence, its pluralistic interpretive stance, and its allegorical mode of narration allow it to be classified as a “new historical film.” This category challenges audience expectations shaped by conventional realism and offers an alternative vision of the Great Terror in Leningrad in 1938. Viewer responses indicate that, despite criticisms of historical inaccuracy, the film’s cultural references remain legible and meaningful. The film draws upon the aesthetics of comic books and endless runner video games. This “clip-like” quality differentiates it from traditional historical film, which seeks to evoke authenticity. As a result, the boundaries between reality and imagination, the familiar and the fantastic, the past and the present become fluid. This raises critical questions regarding the capacities and constraints of artistic representation in historical cinema, and underscores the value of film reviews as supplementary materials for research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Человек и культура
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8744.2025.4.75514
Primary Topic
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cinematic field of experiments: historical reality in the film “Captain Volkonogov Escaped” (2021)

Svetlana Vyacheslavovna Kuznetsova, Elizaveta Vladimirovna Prokhorova
Человек и культура
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
article

Cinematic field of experiments: historical reality in the film “Captain Volkonogov Escaped” (2021)

Svetlana Vyacheslavovna Kuznetsova, Elizaveta Vladimirovna Prokhorova
article en

Abstract

This article examines the specificity of representing the past in contemporary cinema, in which the principle of strict realism is no longer absolute. In modern feature films, interpretations of historical events are constructed not on the basis of historiographical evidence, but through the deployment of cinema’s expressive resources. Consequently, the past is apprehended via the viewer’s visual perception of the constructed historical reality. Such films thus become distinctive documents of historical culture, prompting the development of new methodological approaches for their analysis as historical sources. Using "Captain Volkonogov Escaped" (2021), directed by N. Merkulova and A. Chupov, as a case study, the authors identify the cinematic strategies by which a historical reality is generated. The analysis integrates narrative, visual, and semiotic perspectives, focusing on the structuring of the film’s storytelling, the chromatic solutions, cinematographic and editing techniques, as well as the use of symbols and metaphors. The film’s departure from the realist method, its engagement with the theme of violence, its pluralistic interpretive stance, and its allegorical mode of narration allow it to be classified as a “new historical film.” This category challenges audience expectations shaped by conventional realism and offers an alternative vision of the Great Terror in Leningrad in 1938. Viewer responses indicate that, despite criticisms of historical inaccuracy, the film’s cultural references remain legible and meaningful. The film draws upon the aesthetics of comic books and endless runner video games. This “clip-like” quality differentiates it from traditional historical film, which seeks to evoke authenticity. As a result, the boundaries between reality and imagination, the familiar and the fantastic, the past and the present become fluid. This raises critical questions regarding the capacities and constraints of artistic representation in historical cinema, and underscores the value of film reviews as supplementary materials for research.

Человек и культура(4)
N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.