Comparative Analysis of Action Recognition Techniques: Exploring Two-Stream CNNs, C3D, LSTM, I3D, Attention Mechanisms, and Hybrid Models

Action recognition actions in video are sophisticated processes that demand more and more explicitly captured spatial and temporal information.This paper gives a comparison of several advanced techniques for action recognition using the UCF101 dataset.We look at two-stream convolutional networks, 3D convolutional networks, long short-term memory networks, two-stream inflated 3D convolutional networks, attention mechanisms, and hybrid models.Their methods have been examined for each of the proposed options along with their architectures, as well as their pros and cons.The results of our experiments have revealed the performance of these approaches on the UCF101 dataset, including a focus on the tradeoffs between computational efficiency, data requirements, and recognition accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025107043
Primary Topic
Human Pose and Action Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Action Recognition Techniques: Exploring Two-Stream CNNs, C3D, LSTM, I3D, Attention Mechanisms, and Hybrid Models

Nugraha Nugraha, Gursharan Singh, Arun Malik, Arshiya
Human Pose and Action Recognition
article

Comparative Analysis of Action Recognition Techniques: Exploring Two-Stream CNNs, C3D, LSTM, I3D, Attention Mechanisms, and Hybrid Models

Nugraha Nugraha, Gursharan Singh, Arun Malik, Arshiya
article en

Abstract

Action recognition actions in video are sophisticated processes that demand more and more explicitly captured spatial and temporal information.This paper gives a comparison of several advanced techniques for action recognition using the UCF101 dataset.We look at two-stream convolutional networks, 3D convolutional networks, long short-term memory networks, two-stream inflated 3D convolutional networks, attention mechanisms, and hybrid models.Their methods have been examined for each of the proposed options along with their architectures, as well as their pros and cons.The results of our experiments have revealed the performance of these approaches on the UCF101 dataset, including a focus on the tradeoffs between computational efficiency, data requirements, and recognition accuracy.

Lovely Professional University (IN), Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Human Pose and Action Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Action Recognition Techniques: Exploring Two-Stream CNNs, C3D, LSTM, I3D, Attention Mechanisms, and Hybrid Models — Nugraha Nugraha, Gursharan Singh, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS