Wildfire probability assessment and analysis based on multi-source data in Guangxi Province, China

• EBF and RF models robustly assessed wildfire probability in Guangxi Province. • Relative humidity was identified as the primary factor driving wildfire risk. • Novel temporal segmentation improved wildfire risk identification accuracy. • Spatially explicit results enhance targeted wildfire prevention strategies. Wildfires are key environmental variables in global climate monitoring systems that significantly impact ecosystems, human life, and property. This study assessed the probability of wildfires in Guangxi Province using multi-source data and the Evidence Belief Function (EBF) model. A stratified random sampling method was applied to evaluate the accuracy of the three wildfire remote sensing products (MCD64A1, Fire_CCI51, and MCD14ML). Among these, MCD64A1 was identified as the most reliable dataset for mapping wildfires in the region. By dividing the year into three wildfire occurrence periods (A, B, and C) and combining 14 wildfire factors from 2003 to 2018, the EBF model was used to map and analyze the spatial distribution of wildfire risk. The relative importance of each wildfire factor was evaluated using a Random Forest (RF) model. The validation results confirmed that the AUC values of the success rate of the EBF model were all greater than 0.7, indicating that the model performed well in wildfire risk assessments. The derived wildfire probability map showed strong spatial consistency between the assessed probability levels and observed wildfire events, with high-risk areas in the northwest, central, and northeast regions of Guangxi. Furthermore, relative humidity was identified as the most significant factor influencing wildfire probability, while land surface temperature (LST), wind speed, and a human influence indicator, the Human Footprint (HPF), also had a significant effect on wildfire probability. These findings highlight the reliability of the EBF and RF models as tools for prediction evaluation and provide insights into effective resource allocation and wildfire prevention strategies in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114148
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wildfire probability assessment and analysis based on multi-source data in Guangxi Province, China

Anshad Mohamed Abdulla, Kevin J. Tansey, Shugang Yang, Rufat Guluzade et al.
2 citations
Ecological Indicators
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
article

Wildfire probability assessment and analysis based on multi-source data in Guangxi Province, China

Anshad Mohamed Abdulla, Kevin J. Tansey, Shugang Yang, Rufat Guluzade, Cuiju Zhu, Min He, Xin Pan, Yingbao Yang, Zi Yang, Kun Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• EBF and RF models robustly assessed wildfire probability in Guangxi Province. • Relative humidity was identified as the primary factor driving wildfire risk. • Novel temporal segmentation improved wildfire risk identification accuracy. • Spatially explicit results enhance targeted wildfire prevention strategies. Wildfires are key environmental variables in global climate monitoring systems that significantly impact ecosystems, human life, and property. This study assessed the probability of wildfires in Guangxi Province using multi-source data and the Evidence Belief Function (EBF) model. A stratified random sampling method was applied to evaluate the accuracy of the three wildfire remote sensing products (MCD64A1, Fire_CCI51, and MCD14ML). Among these, MCD64A1 was identified as the most reliable dataset for mapping wildfires in the region. By dividing the year into three wildfire occurrence periods (A, B, and C) and combining 14 wildfire factors from 2003 to 2018, the EBF model was used to map and analyze the spatial distribution of wildfire risk. The relative importance of each wildfire factor was evaluated using a Random Forest (RF) model. The validation results confirmed that the AUC values of the success rate of the EBF model were all greater than 0.7, indicating that the model performed well in wildfire risk assessments. The derived wildfire probability map showed strong spatial consistency between the assessed probability levels and observed wildfire events, with high-risk areas in the northwest, central, and northeast regions of Guangxi. Furthermore, relative humidity was identified as the most significant factor influencing wildfire probability, while land surface temperature (LST), wind speed, and a human influence indicator, the Human Footprint (HPF), also had a significant effect on wildfire probability. These findings highlight the reliability of the EBF and RF models as tools for prediction evaluation and provide insights into effective resource allocation and wildfire prevention strategies in the region.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 179
University of Leicester (GB), Hohai University (CN)
Royal Society, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.