Text Classification for AI Generated Content with Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models

The rapid development of generative AI models, such as GPT-4, LLaMA, and Gemini, is causing an explosion of AI-generated text that may be akin to human writing. This poses a challenge in differentiating between AI-generated content and human-authored text across a range of verticals: academic integrity, misinformation detection, and content moderation. This paper presents a comparison of machine learning and deep learning models on the classifier for AI-generated text. We compare the performance of Logistic Regression with TF-IDF features, a Bi-LSTM model, and a fine-tuned DistilBERT model on data from the COLING Workshop on MGT Detection Task 1, involving text samples from five AI models and human authors. Our experiments showed that Bi-LSTM outperforms other models, yielding the best results in accuracy (90.09%) and F1-score (90.02%). We further present the binary classification performance that distinguishes AI-generated text from human-written content, with an accuracy of 95.9%. It is suggested that deep learning methods are competent in detecting AI-generated text, though there are certain limitations, including adversarial attacks and changing styles of AI-generated writing. Future work will be focused on enhancing model robustness through adversarial training and hybrid architectures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sist61657.2025.11139296
Primary Topic
Text and Document Classification Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Text Classification for AI Generated Content with Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models

Shirali Kadyrov, Batyr Sharimbayev
Text and Document Classification Technologies
article

Text Classification for AI Generated Content with Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models

Shirali Kadyrov, Batyr Sharimbayev
article en

Abstract

The rapid development of generative AI models, such as GPT-4, LLaMA, and Gemini, is causing an explosion of AI-generated text that may be akin to human writing. This poses a challenge in differentiating between AI-generated content and human-authored text across a range of verticals: academic integrity, misinformation detection, and content moderation. This paper presents a comparison of machine learning and deep learning models on the classifier for AI-generated text. We compare the performance of Logistic Regression with TF-IDF features, a Bi-LSTM model, and a fine-tuned DistilBERT model on data from the COLING Workshop on MGT Detection Task 1, involving text samples from five AI models and human authors. Our experiments showed that Bi-LSTM outperforms other models, yielding the best results in accuracy (90.09%) and F1-score (90.02%). We further present the binary classification performance that distinguishes AI-generated text from human-written content, with an accuracy of 95.9%. It is suggested that deep learning methods are competent in detecting AI-generated text, though there are certain limitations, including adversarial attacks and changing styles of AI-generated writing. Future work will be focused on enhancing model robustness through adversarial training and hybrid architectures.

Kazakh-American University (KZ), National University of Uzbekistan (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Text and Document Classification Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.