Machine learning based approach for surface roughness prediction in precision dental prototyping

Complex geometries achievable with resin-based 3D printing are susceptible to lower levels of surface roughness, particularly in areas where support structures are attached and removed. The slicing parameter serves as the cornerstone for developing a model for predicting the corresponding output. In the present research, a resin 3D printer is used to fabricate the specimens in accordance with the combination of important parameters that were recovered utilizing the design of the experiment (DoE). Layer thickness, infill population density, print angle, exposure time, and lift speed are the five factors used to build DoE, which consists of 32 ideal runs for assessing surface roughness (SR). SR is a critical factor that influences the durability and effectiveness of dental devices. In order to anticipate output, a model is developed. To choose the best modelling strategies, a comparison of three base model techniques, artificial neural networks (ANN), support-vector regression (SVR), and decision trees (DT), as well as two ensemble techniques, random forest (RF) and XGboost, is conducted. This work utilized hyperparameter tuning for model improvement and use RMSE and R<sup>2</sup> as performance metrices for model efficiency. This application is still relatively underrepresented in the literature and often with isolated ML models rather than hybrid approaches. Among the three base models, SVR performs best with R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE 0.96745 and 0.017974 at C = 5 and gamma = 1 resp. Ensemble techniques justifying clubbing perform better in all ways with XGboost showing R<sup>2</sup> 0.99858 and RMSE 0.00346998 as the best among all techniques. This work helps dental professionals in utilizing ensemble ML to improve model efficiency and predictability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17487-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning based approach for surface roughness prediction in precision dental prototyping

Vishwanath Gurumurthy, Artak G. Heboyan, Anmol Sharma, Mohamed Saheer Kuruniyan et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Dental materials and restorations
3.35
article

Machine learning based approach for surface roughness prediction in precision dental prototyping

Vishwanath Gurumurthy, Artak G. Heboyan, Anmol Sharma, Mohamed Saheer Kuruniyan, Abdulmajeed Okshah, Ashish Kaushik, Rayan Ibrahim H. Binduhayyim, Rajesh Vyas, Ravinder S Saini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Complex geometries achievable with resin-based 3D printing are susceptible to lower levels of surface roughness, particularly in areas where support structures are attached and removed. The slicing parameter serves as the cornerstone for developing a model for predicting the corresponding output. In the present research, a resin 3D printer is used to fabricate the specimens in accordance with the combination of important parameters that were recovered utilizing the design of the experiment (DoE). Layer thickness, infill population density, print angle, exposure time, and lift speed are the five factors used to build DoE, which consists of 32 ideal runs for assessing surface roughness (SR). SR is a critical factor that influences the durability and effectiveness of dental devices. In order to anticipate output, a model is developed. To choose the best modelling strategies, a comparison of three base model techniques, artificial neural networks (ANN), support-vector regression (SVR), and decision trees (DT), as well as two ensemble techniques, random forest (RF) and XGboost, is conducted. This work utilized hyperparameter tuning for model improvement and use RMSE and R<sup>2</sup> as performance metrices for model efficiency. This application is still relatively underrepresented in the literature and often with isolated ML models rather than hybrid approaches. Among the three base models, SVR performs best with R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE 0.96745 and 0.017974 at C = 5 and gamma = 1 resp. Ensemble techniques justifying clubbing perform better in all ways with XGboost showing R<sup>2</sup> 0.99858 and RMSE 0.00346998 as the best among all techniques. This work helps dental professionals in utilizing ensemble ML to improve model efficiency and predictability.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (IN), Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University (IN), Yerevan State Medical University (AM), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR), King Khalid University (SA), Saveetha University (IN)
King Khalid University, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental materials and restorations
3.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.