All’s Well That FID’s Well? Result Quality and Metric Scores in GAN Models for Lip-Synchronization Tasks

This exploratory study investigates the usability of performance metrics for generative adversarial network (GAN)-based models for speech-driven facial animation. These models focus on the transfer of speech information from an audio file to a still image to generate talking-head videos in a small-scale “everyday usage” setting. Two models, LipGAN and a custom implementation of a Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty (L1WGAN-GP), are examined for their visual performance and scoring according to commonly used metrics: Quantitative comparisons using FID, SSIM, and PSNR metrics on the GRIDTest dataset show mixed results, and metrics fail to capture local artifacts crucial for lip synchronization, pointing to limitations in their applicability for video animation tasks. The study points towards the inadequacy of current quantitative measures and emphasizes the continued necessity of human qualitative assessment for evaluating talking-head video quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14173487
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

All’s Well That FID’s Well? Result Quality and Metric Scores in GAN Models for Lip-Synchronization Tasks

Johan Liljegren, Pontus Nordqvist, Carina Geldhauser
Electronics
Speech and Audio Processing
article

All’s Well That FID’s Well? Result Quality and Metric Scores in GAN Models for Lip-Synchronization Tasks

Johan Liljegren, Pontus Nordqvist, Carina Geldhauser
article en

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates the usability of performance metrics for generative adversarial network (GAN)-based models for speech-driven facial animation. These models focus on the transfer of speech information from an audio file to a still image to generate talking-head videos in a small-scale “everyday usage” setting. Two models, LipGAN and a custom implementation of a Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty (L1WGAN-GP), are examined for their visual performance and scoring according to commonly used metrics: Quantitative comparisons using FID, SSIM, and PSNR metrics on the GRIDTest dataset show mixed results, and metrics fail to capture local artifacts crucial for lip synchronization, pointing to limitations in their applicability for video animation tasks. The study points towards the inadequacy of current quantitative measures and emphasizes the continued necessity of human qualitative assessment for evaluating talking-head video quality.

ElectronicsVol. 14(17)
Lund University (SE), ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Speech and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.