Comparative Assessment of Planar Density and Stereoscopic Density for Estimating Grassland Aboveground Fresh Biomass Across Growing Season

Grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) serves as a critical indicator of ecosystem productivity and carbon cycling, playing a pivotal role in ecosystem functioning. The advances in hyperspectral and terrestrial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data have provided new opportunities for grassland AGB monitoring, but current research remains predominantly focused on data-driven machine learning models. The black-box nature of such approaches resulted in a lack of clear interpretation regarding the coupling relationships between these two data types in grassland AGB estimation. For grassland aboveground fresh biomass, the theoretical estimation can be decomposed into either the product of planar density (PD) and plot area or the product of stereoscopic density (SD) and grassland community volume. Based on this theory, our study developed a semi-mechanistic remote sensing model for grassland AGB estimation by integrating hyperspectral-derived biomass density with extracted structural parameters from terrestrial LiDAR. Initially, we built hyperspectral estimation models for both PD and SD of grassland fresh AGB using PLSR. Subsequently, by integrating the inversion results with grassland quadrat area and community volume measurements, respectively, we achieved quadrat-scale remote sensing estimation of grassland AGB. Finally, we conducted comparative accuracy assessments of both methods across different phenological stages to evaluate their performance differences. Our results demonstrated that SD, which incorporated structural features, could be more precisely estimated (R2 = 0.90, nRMSE = 7.92%, Bias% = 0.01%) based on hyperspectral data compared to PD (R2 = 0.79, nRMSE = 10.19%, Bias% = −7.25%), with significant differences observed in their respective responsive spectral bands. PD showed greater sensitivity to shortwave infrared regions, while SD exhibited stronger associations with visible, red-edge, and near-infrared bands. Although both methods achieved comparable overall AGB estimation accuracy (PD-based: R2 = 0.79, nRMSE = 10.19%, Bias% = −7.25%; SD-based: R2 = 0.82, nRMSE = 10.58%, Bias% = 1.86%), the SD-based approach effectively mitigated the underestimation of high biomass values caused by spectral saturation effects and also demonstrated superior and more stable performance across different growth periods (R2 > 0.6). This work provided concrete physical meaning to the integration of hyperspectral and LiDAR data for grassland AGB monitoring and further suggested the potential of multi-source remote sensing data fusion in estimating grassland AGB. The findings offered theoretical foundations for developing large-scale grassland AGB monitoring models using airborne and spaceborne remote sensing platforms.