Game vs. Practice Differences in External Load in U16 and U18 Women’s Basketball Players

The purpose of the present study was twofold: (i) to examine within-group differences in external load metrics during practice and official competition, and (ii) to examine between-group differences in external load metrics across the U16 and U18 levels of play. A total of thirty-six female athletes participated in the present study, of which nineteen were U16 and seventeen were U18 basketball players. The athletes wore an inertial measurement unit system (Kinexon) sampling at 20 Hz during practice and official games. The average values for each external load metric across ten practices and five games were used for performance analysis. Dependent and independent <i>t</i>-tests were used to examine within- and between-group statistically significant differences, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The findings reveal that the external load placed on the athletes during the game (e.g., distance covered, average speed, total number of accelerations and decelerations) was considerably greater than the external load during practice sessions, both on the U16 and U18 levels of play. Conversely, while the game-induced external load remained consistent across the two competitive levels, U18 players tended to spend more time and cover more distance in low-speed zones than in high-speed zones during practice, compared to their U16 counterparts, suggesting their superior movement efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13090296
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Game vs. Practice Differences in External Load in U16 and U18 Women’s Basketball Players

Damjana V. Cabarkapa, Dimitrije Čabarkapa, László Balogh, Dóra Nagy et al.
1 citations
Sports
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Game vs. Practice Differences in External Load in U16 and U18 Women’s Basketball Players

Damjana V. Cabarkapa, Dimitrije Čabarkapa, László Balogh, Dóra Nagy, Tamás Laczkó, László Rátgéber
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was twofold: (i) to examine within-group differences in external load metrics during practice and official competition, and (ii) to examine between-group differences in external load metrics across the U16 and U18 levels of play. A total of thirty-six female athletes participated in the present study, of which nineteen were U16 and seventeen were U18 basketball players. The athletes wore an inertial measurement unit system (Kinexon) sampling at 20 Hz during practice and official games. The average values for each external load metric across ten practices and five games were used for performance analysis. Dependent and independent <i>t</i>-tests were used to examine within- and between-group statistically significant differences, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The findings reveal that the external load placed on the athletes during the game (e.g., distance covered, average speed, total number of accelerations and decelerations) was considerably greater than the external load during practice sessions, both on the U16 and U18 levels of play. Conversely, while the game-induced external load remained consistent across the two competitive levels, U18 players tended to spend more time and cover more distance in low-speed zones than in high-speed zones during practice, compared to their U16 counterparts, suggesting their superior movement efficiency.

SportsVol. 13(9)
University of Debrecen (HU), Singidunum University (RS), University of Novi Sad (RS), Center for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences (RS), Hungarian School Sport Federation (HU), University of Pecs (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.