Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive microscopic debridement in thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis

Thoracolumbar infectious spondylodiscitis is a serious condition that often requires surgical intervention if conservative treatment fails. Debridement and drainage are crucial in removing infected tissues and achieving adequate control of the source of infection. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of microscopic debridement in patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 128 patients treated for thoracolumbar spinal infections between March 2017 and December 2021. Overall, 40 patients with spondylodiscitis who underwent only microscopic debridement were included in the study. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory results, surgical details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Of 40 patients, 28 had bone destruction. Patients with bone destruction showed poorer initial clinical outcomes, higher low back pain, worse disability, and lower quality of life scores than those without it. However, the long-term outcomes were favorable, with 63% achieving spontaneous bone union and all patients showing resolution of instability. However, 14% of the patients with bone destruction required further fusion surgery. Microscopic debridement results in favorable clinical outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis, including those with bone destruction. This approach is a potential alternative to fusion surgery, particularly in patients with a poor general condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17050-w
Primary Topic
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive microscopic debridement in thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis

Jin S. Yeom, Dae-Woong Ham, Jiwon Park, Sang‐Min Park et al.
Scientific Reports
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
article

Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive microscopic debridement in thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis

Jin S. Yeom, Dae-Woong Ham, Jiwon Park, Sang‐Min Park, Ohsang Kwon, Ho-Joong Kim
article en

Abstract

Thoracolumbar infectious spondylodiscitis is a serious condition that often requires surgical intervention if conservative treatment fails. Debridement and drainage are crucial in removing infected tissues and achieving adequate control of the source of infection. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of microscopic debridement in patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 128 patients treated for thoracolumbar spinal infections between March 2017 and December 2021. Overall, 40 patients with spondylodiscitis who underwent only microscopic debridement were included in the study. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory results, surgical details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Of 40 patients, 28 had bone destruction. Patients with bone destruction showed poorer initial clinical outcomes, higher low back pain, worse disability, and lower quality of life scores than those without it. However, the long-term outcomes were favorable, with 63% achieving spontaneous bone union and all patients showing resolution of instability. However, 14% of the patients with bone destruction required further fusion surgery. Microscopic debridement results in favorable clinical outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis, including those with bone destruction. This approach is a potential alternative to fusion surgery, particularly in patients with a poor general condition.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Ansan University (KR), Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR), Korea University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.