Validating and Estimating Indirect Accident Costs in Saudi Construction: A Bottom-Up Approach

Accurately estimating the indirect costs of construction accidents is essential to fully understand their economic and social impacts, especially in Saudi Arabia’s rapidly growing construction sector. While direct costs like medical expenses are documented, indirect costs-including lost productivity, project delays, and training-often surpass direct costs but remain difficult to quantify. This study aimed to develop and validate a bottom-up framework to estimate indirect costs of construction accidents across diverse company sizes and project types in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province. A quantitative explanatory study was conducted from November 2020 to December 2022 involving 40 construction companies selected via quota sampling to represent various sizes and project types. Indirect cost indicators were identified based on Haupt and Pillay’s framework and validated by an expert panel using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Kappa statistics. Data on overtime, supervisory time, investigation, training, equipment damage, legal/administrative, and miscellaneous costs were collected through structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics analyzed cost variations by company size. All nine indirect cost indicators showed strong content validity with CVI scores of 0.8 to 1.0 and substantial expert agreement. Survey results revealed significant differences in indirect costs by company size. Medium-sized firms (101–500 employees) incurred the highest overtime and investigation costs, while large firms (>500 employees) exhibited the greatest supervisory, training, and legal expenses. Smaller firms (<50 employees) faced relatively higher equipment damage and miscellaneous costs. Geographic and project type diversity ensured comprehensive regional representation. The validated framework effectively captures the multifaceted indirect costs of construction accidents in Saudi Arabia. Findings highlight the need for size-specific safety interventions and resource allocation to reduce financial burdens. Tailored prevention strategies and enhanced training programs are crucial, particularly for medium and large companies, while smaller firms require targeted support to manage indirect cost challenges. This study provides a robust foundation for policymakers and industry leaders to improve occupational health and safety investments in the construction sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1208.19238
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating and Estimating Indirect Accident Costs in Saudi Construction: A Bottom-Up Approach

Abdulaziz Alotaibi, Mohammad A. Hassanain, Ng Yee Guan, Shamsul Bahri Hj. Mohd Tamrin
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Validating and Estimating Indirect Accident Costs in Saudi Construction: A Bottom-Up Approach

Abdulaziz Alotaibi, Mohammad A. Hassanain, Ng Yee Guan, Shamsul Bahri Hj. Mohd Tamrin
article en

Abstract

Accurately estimating the indirect costs of construction accidents is essential to fully understand their economic and social impacts, especially in Saudi Arabia’s rapidly growing construction sector. While direct costs like medical expenses are documented, indirect costs-including lost productivity, project delays, and training-often surpass direct costs but remain difficult to quantify. This study aimed to develop and validate a bottom-up framework to estimate indirect costs of construction accidents across diverse company sizes and project types in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province. A quantitative explanatory study was conducted from November 2020 to December 2022 involving 40 construction companies selected via quota sampling to represent various sizes and project types. Indirect cost indicators were identified based on Haupt and Pillay’s framework and validated by an expert panel using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Kappa statistics. Data on overtime, supervisory time, investigation, training, equipment damage, legal/administrative, and miscellaneous costs were collected through structured questionnaires. Descriptive statistics analyzed cost variations by company size. All nine indirect cost indicators showed strong content validity with CVI scores of 0.8 to 1.0 and substantial expert agreement. Survey results revealed significant differences in indirect costs by company size. Medium-sized firms (101–500 employees) incurred the highest overtime and investigation costs, while large firms (>500 employees) exhibited the greatest supervisory, training, and legal expenses. Smaller firms (<50 employees) faced relatively higher equipment damage and miscellaneous costs. Geographic and project type diversity ensured comprehensive regional representation. The validated framework effectively captures the multifaceted indirect costs of construction accidents in Saudi Arabia. Findings highlight the need for size-specific safety interventions and resource allocation to reduce financial burdens. Tailored prevention strategies and enhanced training programs are crucial, particularly for medium and large companies, while smaller firms require targeted support to manage indirect cost challenges. This study provides a robust foundation for policymakers and industry leaders to improve occupational health and safety investments in the construction sector.

Advances in Social Sciences Research JournalVol. 12(08)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), University of Petroleum (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.