A systematic analysis of contemporary whole exome sequencing capture kits to optimise high-coverage capture of CCDS regions

Whole exome sequencing (WES) is a well-established tool for clinical diagnostics, is more cost-effective and faster to analyse than whole genome sequencing and has been implemented to uplift diagnostic rates in human disease. However, challenges remain to achieve comprehensive and uniform coverage of targets, and high sensitivity and specificity. Differences in genomic target regions and exome capture mechanism between kits may lead to differences in overall coverage uniformity and capture efficiency. Here, we analyse the efficiency of a range of off-the-shelf exome sequencing (ES) kits in capturing their reported targets and the consensus coding sequence (CCDS) regions. Our results show Twist Custom Exome, Twist Human Comprehensive Exome, and Roche KAPA HyperExome V1 perform particularly well at capturing their target regions at 10X and 20X coverage and achieve the highest capture efficiency of CCDS regions upon read downsampling. This was the case despite both Twist kits targeting less than 37Mb in the genome. Our analysis highlights the impact of kit target design on capture efficiency in WES, with kit target size and uniformity of coverage impacting the capture efficiency of CCDS regions. This benchmark will help researchers to make an informed decision based on their needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaf115
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic analysis of contemporary whole exome sequencing capture kits to optimise high-coverage capture of CCDS regions

Sarah Ennis, James John Ashton, Guo Cheng, Fernando Lopez
1 links
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

A systematic analysis of contemporary whole exome sequencing capture kits to optimise high-coverage capture of CCDS regions

Sarah Ennis, James John Ashton, Guo Cheng, Fernando Lopez
article en

Abstract

Whole exome sequencing (WES) is a well-established tool for clinical diagnostics, is more cost-effective and faster to analyse than whole genome sequencing and has been implemented to uplift diagnostic rates in human disease. However, challenges remain to achieve comprehensive and uniform coverage of targets, and high sensitivity and specificity. Differences in genomic target regions and exome capture mechanism between kits may lead to differences in overall coverage uniformity and capture efficiency. Here, we analyse the efficiency of a range of off-the-shelf exome sequencing (ES) kits in capturing their reported targets and the consensus coding sequence (CCDS) regions. Our results show Twist Custom Exome, Twist Human Comprehensive Exome, and Roche KAPA HyperExome V1 perform particularly well at capturing their target regions at 10X and 20X coverage and achieve the highest capture efficiency of CCDS regions upon read downsampling. This was the case despite both Twist kits targeting less than 37Mb in the genome. Our analysis highlights the impact of kit target design on capture efficiency in WES, with kit target size and uniformity of coverage impacting the capture efficiency of CCDS regions. This benchmark will help researchers to make an informed decision based on their needs.

NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsVol. 7(3)
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Southampton Children's Hospital (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
National Institute on Handicapped Research, National Institute for Health and Care Research, University of Southampton, Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.