Constitutional Judging under Pressure: The Role of Judges in Safeguarding the Rule of Law, Equality, and Planetary Survival

Abstract Introducing the Special Issue on “Judging under Pressure,” this Article sets out three interlinked challenges facing constitutional courts, broadly understood: persisting inequalities, the climate crisis, and rising autocratization. The Articles in this Special Issue identify, analyze, and prescribe a set of judicial responses and strategies when judging under pressure. Some reimagine and recalibrate the role of judges, while others respond with doctrinal and theoretical innovation; yet, throughout, there is a recognition of judicial constraints and institutional fragility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
German Law Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2025.13
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutional Judging under Pressure: The Role of Judges in Safeguarding the Rule of Law, Equality, and Planetary Survival

Cathryn Costello, Nora Markard, Başak Çalı
1 citations
German Law Journal
Legal and Constitutional Studies
3.13
article

Constitutional Judging under Pressure: The Role of Judges in Safeguarding the Rule of Law, Equality, and Planetary Survival

Cathryn Costello, Nora Markard, Başak Çalı
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introducing the Special Issue on “Judging under Pressure,” this Article sets out three interlinked challenges facing constitutional courts, broadly understood: persisting inequalities, the climate crisis, and rising autocratization. The Articles in this Special Issue identify, analyze, and prescribe a set of judicial responses and strategies when judging under pressure. Some reimagine and recalibrate the role of judges, while others respond with doctrinal and theoretical innovation; yet, throughout, there is a recognition of judicial constraints and institutional fragility.

German Law JournalVol. 26(2)
University College Dublin (IE), University of Münster (DE), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Legal and Constitutional Studies
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.