<scp>cIMPACT</scp> ‐ <scp>NOW</scp> update 11: Proposal on adaptation of diagnostic criteria for <scp>IDH</scp> ‐ and <scp>H3</scp> ‐wildtype diffuse high‐grade gliomas and for posterior fossa ependymal tumors

The Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to Central Nervous System Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) updates provide guidelines for the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors and suggestions for future World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Following publication of the fifth edition WHO Classification of CNS Tumors (WHO CNS5) in 2021, the cIMPACT-NOW working group "Clarification" reviewed WHO CNS5 and prioritized two topics for further elucidation: (a) distinction of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype from Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype and (b) clarification of subgroups of posterior fossa (PF) ependymal tumors. Recommendations regarding the IDH- and H3-wildtype diffuse high-grade gliomas include: (1) use caution assigning CNS WHO grade 4 (diagnosis of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype) to a "TERT promoter only", histologically low-grade, IDH-wildtype tumor; (2) EGFR gene amplification and +7/-10 chromosome copy number alterations should not be used as solitary defining features for diagnosing high-grade gliomas as Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype in patients <40 years of age; (3) Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype should be considered in the differential diagnosis in adults, especially those <40 years of age; (4) PDGFRA alteration, EGFR alteration, or MYCN amplification count as key molecular features of Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype only in patients <25 years. Guidelines for improved diagnosis of posterior fossa ependymal tumors include: (1) immunohistochemical demonstration of nuclear EZHIP supports classification as PF group A ependymoma; (2) a PF ependymoma with retained nuclear H3 K27me3 expression and no nuclear EZHIP overexpression for which DNA methylation profiling is not performed should be considered as PF ependymoma, "not otherwise specified"; (3) for emerging tumors not included in WHO CNS5, "not elsewhere classified" (NEC) can be added to the diagnosis. Of note, these recommendations are not formal changes to the WHO definitions and diagnostic criteria but are intended to provide diagnostic guidance in advance of WHO CNS6.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Pathology
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.70035
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

cIMPACT ‐ NOW update 11: Proposal on adaptation of diagnostic criteria for IDH ‐ and H3 ‐wildtype diffuse high‐grade gliomas and for posterior fossa ependymal tumors

Dominique Figarella‐Branger, Martin J. van den Bent, Uri Tabori, Guido Reifenberger et al.
9 citations
Brain Pathology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
14.63
article

cIMPACT ‐ NOW update 11: Proposal on adaptation of diagnostic criteria for IDH ‐ and H3 ‐wildtype diffuse high‐grade gliomas and for posterior fossa ependymal tumors

Dominique Figarella‐Branger, Martin J. van den Bent, Uri Tabori, Guido Reifenberger, Michael Weller, David N. Louis, Brent A. Orr, Takashi Komori, David Capper, Stefan M. Pfister, Vani Santosh, Pieter Wesseling, Arie Perry, Chitra Sarkar, Cynthia Hawkins, B. K. Kleinschmidt‐DeMasters, Werner Paulus
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to Central Nervous System Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) updates provide guidelines for the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors and suggestions for future World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Following publication of the fifth edition WHO Classification of CNS Tumors (WHO CNS5) in 2021, the cIMPACT-NOW working group "Clarification" reviewed WHO CNS5 and prioritized two topics for further elucidation: (a) distinction of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype from Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype and (b) clarification of subgroups of posterior fossa (PF) ependymal tumors. Recommendations regarding the IDH- and H3-wildtype diffuse high-grade gliomas include: (1) use caution assigning CNS WHO grade 4 (diagnosis of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype) to a "TERT promoter only", histologically low-grade, IDH-wildtype tumor; (2) EGFR gene amplification and +7/-10 chromosome copy number alterations should not be used as solitary defining features for diagnosing high-grade gliomas as Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype in patients <40 years of age; (3) Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype should be considered in the differential diagnosis in adults, especially those <40 years of age; (4) PDGFRA alteration, EGFR alteration, or MYCN amplification count as key molecular features of Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype only in patients <25 years. Guidelines for improved diagnosis of posterior fossa ependymal tumors include: (1) immunohistochemical demonstration of nuclear EZHIP supports classification as PF group A ependymoma; (2) a PF ependymoma with retained nuclear H3 K27me3 expression and no nuclear EZHIP overexpression for which DNA methylation profiling is not performed should be considered as PF ependymoma, "not otherwise specified"; (3) for emerging tumors not included in WHO CNS5, "not elsewhere classified" (NEC) can be added to the diagnosis. Of note, these recommendations are not formal changes to the WHO definitions and diagnostic criteria but are intended to provide diagnostic guidance in advance of WHO CNS6.

Brain PathologyVol. 36(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US), German Cancer Research Center (DE), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Zurich (CH), Heidelberg University (DE), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Institut de Neurophysiopathologie (FR), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), University Hospital Münster (DE), University of California San Francisco Medical Center (US), Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (DE), Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital (JP), Princess Máxima Center (NL), SickKids Foundation (CA), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Neurological Surgery (US), Hôpital de la Timone (FR), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN), Hochschule Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
14.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.