Causes and Controlling Factors of Overpressure Systems in the Qingshankou Formation: Insights for Unconventional Oil and Gas Exploration

Overpressure systems in the Qingshankou Formation of the Gulong Sag have a significant impact on unconventional shale oil accumulation, but their distribution and genesis are unknown. This study uses a comparative analysis of three primary pressure prediction methods—the equivalent depth method, the Eaton method, and the Bowers method—to investigate the genetic mechanisms of overpressure and their controlling factors. The study clarifies the link between overpressure and hydrocarbon distribution. The key findings are as follows. (1) The Eaton method is identified as the best approach for estimating current formation pore pressure. The Qingshankou Formation exhibits mild overpressure development, with a maximum pressure coefficient of 1.44. (2) Hydrocarbon-generating overpressure, driven by source rock maturation, is confirmed as the dominant mechanism through integrated acoustic velocity–density cross plots and logging analysis. (3) Tectonic-sedimentary factors, such as burial depth, source rock thickness, sand-mud ratio, and faults, collectively control the spatial variability of overpressure. (4) The distribution of the Gulong shale oil and the Fuyu tight oil is influenced by overpressure, with the northwestern part of the sag and the adjacent sand bodies being the respectively favorable areas. These results lay the groundwork for accurately reconstructing paleopressure and better understanding the hydrocarbon accumulation potential of shale oil and Fuyu tight oil. They also provide guidance on the exploration and development of unconventional resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092790
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Causes and Controlling Factors of Overpressure Systems in the Qingshankou Formation: Insights for Unconventional Oil and Gas Exploration

Qiang Zheng, Xiuli Fu, Fangju Chen, Shuangfang Lu et al.
1 links
Processes
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Causes and Controlling Factors of Overpressure Systems in the Qingshankou Formation: Insights for Unconventional Oil and Gas Exploration

Qiang Zheng, Xiuli Fu, Fangju Chen, Shuangfang Lu, Mengxia Li, Jie Li, Guoshuai Bai, Suo Wang
article en

Abstract

Overpressure systems in the Qingshankou Formation of the Gulong Sag have a significant impact on unconventional shale oil accumulation, but their distribution and genesis are unknown. This study uses a comparative analysis of three primary pressure prediction methods—the equivalent depth method, the Eaton method, and the Bowers method—to investigate the genetic mechanisms of overpressure and their controlling factors. The study clarifies the link between overpressure and hydrocarbon distribution. The key findings are as follows. (1) The Eaton method is identified as the best approach for estimating current formation pore pressure. The Qingshankou Formation exhibits mild overpressure development, with a maximum pressure coefficient of 1.44. (2) Hydrocarbon-generating overpressure, driven by source rock maturation, is confirmed as the dominant mechanism through integrated acoustic velocity–density cross plots and logging analysis. (3) Tectonic-sedimentary factors, such as burial depth, source rock thickness, sand-mud ratio, and faults, collectively control the spatial variability of overpressure. (4) The distribution of the Gulong shale oil and the Fuyu tight oil is influenced by overpressure, with the northwestern part of the sag and the adjacent sand bodies being the respectively favorable areas. These results lay the groundwork for accurately reconstructing paleopressure and better understanding the hydrocarbon accumulation potential of shale oil and Fuyu tight oil. They also provide guidance on the exploration and development of unconventional resources.

ProcessesVol. 13(9)
China University of Geosciences (CN), Daqing Oilfield General Hospital (CN), Daqing Oilfield of CNPC, Northeast Petroleum University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.