PROTECTION OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF BUSINESS ENTITIES (JUDICIAL AND NOTARIAL ASPECTS)

The article demonstrates the most significant problems occurring in the field of protecting the rights and interests of domestic business entities. It is shown that the current legislation, like a decade ago, does not contain a clear criterion for distinguishing civil cases between courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. The concept of “economic activity” has not yet been disclosed, and therefore the courts, when deciding on the applicable procedural form of conflict resolution, are guided by their inner conviction. The institution of transfer of cases by arbitration courts to the system of courts of general jurisdiction is criticized, and the absence of a single criterion for differentiating arbitration proceedings into types of proceedings is demonstrated. Notarization of mediation agreements is not implemented in procedural legislation, which does not allow increasing the efficiency of judicial protection of the rights of entrepreneurs and reducing the burden on the judicial system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Нотариальный вестник
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53578/1819-6624_2025_7_26
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PROTECTION OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF BUSINESS ENTITIES (JUDICIAL AND NOTARIAL ASPECTS)

Ekaterina V. Mikhailova
Нотариальный вестник
Corporate Governance and Law
article

PROTECTION OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF BUSINESS ENTITIES (JUDICIAL AND NOTARIAL ASPECTS)

Ekaterina V. Mikhailova
article en

Abstract

The article demonstrates the most significant problems occurring in the field of protecting the rights and interests of domestic business entities. It is shown that the current legislation, like a decade ago, does not contain a clear criterion for distinguishing civil cases between courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. The concept of “economic activity” has not yet been disclosed, and therefore the courts, when deciding on the applicable procedural form of conflict resolution, are guided by their inner conviction. The institution of transfer of cases by arbitration courts to the system of courts of general jurisdiction is criticized, and the absence of a single criterion for differentiating arbitration proceedings into types of proceedings is demonstrated. Notarization of mediation agreements is not implemented in procedural legislation, which does not allow increasing the efficiency of judicial protection of the rights of entrepreneurs and reducing the burden on the judicial system.

Нотариальный вестникVol. 7
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.