Relational Thinking for Landscape Management and Conservation: can we really embrace a human/nature continuity?

It is increasingly recognized that the conservation of natural and degraded landscapes requires rethinking our relationships with nature by considering social-ecological complexity. Currently, managers are faced with a wealth of knowledge in landscape ecology, restoration ecology and related fields, that are all mobilized to solve management problems. However, many conceptual propositions fall inadvertently in the same human/nature divide that they try to surpass if based only on a systemic approach. In this article, we analyse the varying degrees to which restoration, reconciliation and reclamation ecologies have been influenced by relational thinking bringing together the cultural, social and ecological spheres. The greatest challenge remains to understand human-nature relationships as continuous, facilitating the integration of diversity of relationships, values and worldviews that require necessarily larger research and management teams, something not always possible to fund.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/x2c069
Primary Topic
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relational Thinking for Landscape Management and Conservation: can we really embrace a human/nature continuity?

Juan Fernández‐Manjarrés, Élie Pédarros
1 links
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
article

Relational Thinking for Landscape Management and Conservation: can we really embrace a human/nature continuity?

Juan Fernández‐Manjarrés, Élie Pédarros
article en

Abstract

It is increasingly recognized that the conservation of natural and degraded landscapes requires rethinking our relationships with nature by considering social-ecological complexity. Currently, managers are faced with a wealth of knowledge in landscape ecology, restoration ecology and related fields, that are all mobilized to solve management problems. However, many conceptual propositions fall inadvertently in the same human/nature divide that they try to surpass if based only on a systemic approach. In this article, we analyse the varying degrees to which restoration, reconciliation and reclamation ecologies have been influenced by relational thinking bringing together the cultural, social and ecological spheres. The greatest challenge remains to understand human-nature relationships as continuous, facilitating the integration of diversity of relationships, values and worldviews that require necessarily larger research and management teams, something not always possible to fund.

Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.