To the discussion after the report of S.A. Belanovsky “On erroneous interpretations of focus group methodology”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology methodology methods mathematical modeling (Sociology 4M)
Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2025.34.1.9
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To the discussion after the report of S.A. Belanovsky “On erroneous interpretations of focus group methodology”

Т. I. Larina
Sociology methodology methods mathematical modeling (Sociology 4M)
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

To the discussion after the report of S.A. Belanovsky “On erroneous interpretations of focus group methodology”

Т. I. Larina
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Sociology methodology methods mathematical modeling (Sociology 4M)Vol. 31(60)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), Russian New University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To the discussion after the report of S.A. Belanovsky “On erroneous interpretations of focus group methodology” — Т. I. Larina · Sociology methodology methods mathematical modeling (Sociology 4M) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS