From Bedside to Bot-Side: Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Appendicitis Management

<b>Introduction:</b> Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common cause of abdominal pain that can lead to complications like perforation and intra-abdominal abscesses, increasing morbidity and mortality, often requiring emergency surgery. Nevertheless, appendectomy is performed in up to 95% of uncomplicated cases, while complications like perforation and intra-abdominal abscesses increase morbidity and mortality. The current study compares the accuracy of GPT-4.5, DeepSeek R1, and machine learning in assisting with surgical decision-making for patients presenting with lower abdominal pain at the Emergency Department. <b>Methods:</b> In this multicenter retrospective study, 63 histopathologically confirmed appendicitis patients and 50 control patients with right abdominal pain presenting at the Emergency Department at two German hospitals between October 2022 and October 2023 were included. Using each patient's clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings, DeepSeek (with and without Retrieval-Augmented Generation using 2020 Jerusalem guidelines) was compared in terms of accuracy with GPT-4.5 and a random forest-based machine-learning model, with a board-certified surgeon (reference standard) to determine the optimal treatment approach (laparoscopic exploration/appendectomy versus conservative antibiotic therapy). <b>Results:</b> Accuracy of agreement with board-certified surgeons in the decision-making of appendectomy versus conservative therapy increased non-significantly from 80.5% to 83.2% with DeepSeek and from 70.8 to 76.1% when GPT-4.5 was provided with the World Journal of Emergency Surgery 2020 Jerusalem guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. The estimated machine-learning model training accuracy was 84.3%, while the validation accuracy for the model was 85.0%. <b>Discussion:</b> GPT-4.5 and DeepSeek R1, as well as the machine-learning model, demonstrate promise in aiding surgical decision-making for appendicitis, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Ongoing training and validation are required to optimize the performance of such models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life15091387
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Bedside to Bot-Side: Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Appendicitis Management

Johannes Bremm, Sithin Thulasi Seetha, David Maintz, Christiane J. Bruns et al.
1 citations
Life
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
2.25
article

From Bedside to Bot-Side: Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Appendicitis Management

Johannes Bremm, Sithin Thulasi Seetha, David Maintz, Christiane J. Bruns, Lukas Goertz, Sebastian Sanduleanu, Jonathan Kottlors, Nuran Abdullayev, Claus Zimmer, Tim Damer, Koray Ersahin, Cavid Abbasli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common cause of abdominal pain that can lead to complications like perforation and intra-abdominal abscesses, increasing morbidity and mortality, often requiring emergency surgery. Nevertheless, appendectomy is performed in up to 95% of uncomplicated cases, while complications like perforation and intra-abdominal abscesses increase morbidity and mortality. The current study compares the accuracy of GPT-4.5, DeepSeek R1, and machine learning in assisting with surgical decision-making for patients presenting with lower abdominal pain at the Emergency Department. <b>Methods:</b> In this multicenter retrospective study, 63 histopathologically confirmed appendicitis patients and 50 control patients with right abdominal pain presenting at the Emergency Department at two German hospitals between October 2022 and October 2023 were included. Using each patient's clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings, DeepSeek (with and without Retrieval-Augmented Generation using 2020 Jerusalem guidelines) was compared in terms of accuracy with GPT-4.5 and a random forest-based machine-learning model, with a board-certified surgeon (reference standard) to determine the optimal treatment approach (laparoscopic exploration/appendectomy versus conservative antibiotic therapy). <b>Results:</b> Accuracy of agreement with board-certified surgeons in the decision-making of appendectomy versus conservative therapy increased non-significantly from 80.5% to 83.2% with DeepSeek and from 70.8 to 76.1% when GPT-4.5 was provided with the World Journal of Emergency Surgery 2020 Jerusalem guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. The estimated machine-learning model training accuracy was 84.3%, while the validation accuracy for the model was 85.0%. <b>Discussion:</b> GPT-4.5 and DeepSeek R1, as well as the machine-learning model, demonstrate promise in aiding surgical decision-making for appendicitis, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Ongoing training and validation are required to optimize the performance of such models.

LifeVol. 15(9)
University of Cologne (DE), Azerbaijan Technical University (AZ), National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (IT), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.