COMPREENSÕES E USOS DA PROVA PAULISTA POR DOCENTES E COORDENADORES(AS) DE GESTÃO PEDAGÓGICA

This article analyzes how the Prova Paulista (Paulista Exam), a bimonthly digital assessment applied by the state education network of São Paulo, has been understood and used by teachers and pedagogical management coordinators (CGP). The investigation, conducted through a qualitative approach, was carried out in a state school in Bragança Paulista, based on observations of pedagogical meetings, questionnaires administered to teachers, and interviews with CGPs. Content analysis of the data obtained from questionnaires and interviews allowed for the identification of seven categories: Prova Paulista: definitions and purposes; Use of the Prova Paulista in the school context; Relationship between the Prova Paulista and digital materials; The school's material conditions for administering the Prova Paulista; Prova Paulista and Seduc: the control of school work; Students taking the Prova Paulista: the challenge of the digital format; (Mis)trust in the results of the Prova Paulista. Among the research findings, it stands out that although the assessment is presented as diagnostic by the State Department of Education (Seduc-SP), it has operated as a mechanism of control, ranking, and curricular narrowing, thereby deepening the logic of meritocracy and teacher accountability. An association between the Prova Paulista and the digital materials sent by Seduc-SP was also observed, which contributes to the loss of teacher autonomy. By linking assessment and digital platforms, the Prova Paulista deepens processes of pedagogical control and the platformization of education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/scielopreprints.13025
Primary Topic
Education Pedagogy and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPREENSÕES E USOS DA PROVA PAULISTA POR DOCENTES E COORDENADORES(AS) DE GESTÃO PEDAGÓGICA

Ariane Iracema De Almeida, Luana Ferrarotto Ferrarotto
Education Pedagogy and Practices
article

COMPREENSÕES E USOS DA PROVA PAULISTA POR DOCENTES E COORDENADORES(AS) DE GESTÃO PEDAGÓGICA

Ariane Iracema De Almeida, Luana Ferrarotto Ferrarotto
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes how the Prova Paulista (Paulista Exam), a bimonthly digital assessment applied by the state education network of São Paulo, has been understood and used by teachers and pedagogical management coordinators (CGP). The investigation, conducted through a qualitative approach, was carried out in a state school in Bragança Paulista, based on observations of pedagogical meetings, questionnaires administered to teachers, and interviews with CGPs. Content analysis of the data obtained from questionnaires and interviews allowed for the identification of seven categories: Prova Paulista: definitions and purposes; Use of the Prova Paulista in the school context; Relationship between the Prova Paulista and digital materials; The school's material conditions for administering the Prova Paulista; Prova Paulista and Seduc: the control of school work; Students taking the Prova Paulista: the challenge of the digital format; (Mis)trust in the results of the Prova Paulista. Among the research findings, it stands out that although the assessment is presented as diagnostic by the State Department of Education (Seduc-SP), it has operated as a mechanism of control, ranking, and curricular narrowing, thereby deepening the logic of meritocracy and teacher accountability. An association between the Prova Paulista and the digital materials sent by Seduc-SP was also observed, which contributes to the loss of teacher autonomy. By linking assessment and digital platforms, the Prova Paulista deepens processes of pedagogical control and the platformization of education.

Federal Institute of São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Education Pedagogy and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.