Post-Pandemic Surges in Public Trust in the United Kingdom

Trust in public institutions was challenged during the COVID-19 global pandemic, with widespread mistrust towards healthcare institutions as well as fellow public institutions. Concurrently, a new public institution or social tool, mass-market artificial intelligence (AI), more broadly emerged, which too may be a target of fluctuating public trust. Using national survey data from the United Kingdom's Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (survey year: 2022, N = 4320; survey year: 2023, N = 4232), we explore the level of trust in civic institutions (healthcare, non-healthcare, and AI) during and immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom using a naturalistic quasi-experimental design. At both waves (2022 and 2023), principal component analysis and structural equation modeling over thirteen public institutions and AI variables confirmed three factors (or domains) of public trust: trust in healthcare institutions, trust in fellow civic institutions other than healthcare, and trust in AI. Measurement invariance testing of mean levels of public trust along each distinct component revealed that as compared with 2022, in 2023, (1) trust in healthcare institutions and in fellow civic institutions other than healthcare significantly increased and (2) trust in AI remained approximately level. Next, latent profile modeling revealed four levels of a common public trust profile, with all three domains of public trust being normatively closely associated. Taken together, these results suggest that a psychological stance of public trust, PT, may increase after a societal crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091193
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-Pandemic Surges in Public Trust in the United Kingdom

Lisa Miller, Lynne Morton, Jason D. Reid, John Rose et al.
Behavioral Sciences
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

Post-Pandemic Surges in Public Trust in the United Kingdom

Lisa Miller, Lynne Morton, Jason D. Reid, John Rose, Sasha Stomberg-Firestein
article en

Abstract

Trust in public institutions was challenged during the COVID-19 global pandemic, with widespread mistrust towards healthcare institutions as well as fellow public institutions. Concurrently, a new public institution or social tool, mass-market artificial intelligence (AI), more broadly emerged, which too may be a target of fluctuating public trust. Using national survey data from the United Kingdom's Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (survey year: 2022, N = 4320; survey year: 2023, N = 4232), we explore the level of trust in civic institutions (healthcare, non-healthcare, and AI) during and immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom using a naturalistic quasi-experimental design. At both waves (2022 and 2023), principal component analysis and structural equation modeling over thirteen public institutions and AI variables confirmed three factors (or domains) of public trust: trust in healthcare institutions, trust in fellow civic institutions other than healthcare, and trust in AI. Measurement invariance testing of mean levels of public trust along each distinct component revealed that as compared with 2022, in 2023, (1) trust in healthcare institutions and in fellow civic institutions other than healthcare significantly increased and (2) trust in AI remained approximately level. Next, latent profile modeling revealed four levels of a common public trust profile, with all three domains of public trust being normatively closely associated. Taken together, these results suggest that a psychological stance of public trust, PT, may increase after a societal crisis.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 15(9)
Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.