A methodology for assessing UX dimensions in standardized questionnaires

User Experience (UX) encompasses many and diverse variables, which contributes to making its evaluation a complex task. Self-evaluation through questionnaires is one of the most commonly used ways to evaluate UX, both in isolation and combined with other instruments or techniques, and there are currently many standardized and validated questionnaires that can be readily applied. Our work suggests a set of dimensions to describe different aspects of UX, and then proposes a methodology to quantify and compare how much different questionnaires emphasize each of these dimensions. We then select a set of ten questionnaires to exemplify the use of our methodology by comparing them in a particular case study. The results show that all selected questionnaires focus on only a few of the dimensions. Our research reinforces the importance of knowing different instruments and being able to compare them, choosing the one best suited to the context of use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5335/rbca.v17i2.16323
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A methodology for assessing UX dimensions in standardized questionnaires

João Luiz Bernardes Júnior, Luciano Antônio Digiampietri, Erico Souza Veriscimo
Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

A methodology for assessing UX dimensions in standardized questionnaires

João Luiz Bernardes Júnior, Luciano Antônio Digiampietri, Erico Souza Veriscimo
article en

Abstract

User Experience (UX) encompasses many and diverse variables, which contributes to making its evaluation a complex task. Self-evaluation through questionnaires is one of the most commonly used ways to evaluate UX, both in isolation and combined with other instruments or techniques, and there are currently many standardized and validated questionnaires that can be readily applied. Our work suggests a set of dimensions to describe different aspects of UX, and then proposes a methodology to quantify and compare how much different questionnaires emphasize each of these dimensions. We then select a set of ten questionnaires to exemplify the use of our methodology by comparing them in a particular case study. The results show that all selected questionnaires focus on only a few of the dimensions. Our research reinforces the importance of knowing different instruments and being able to compare them, choosing the one best suited to the context of use.

Revista Brasileira de Computação AplicadaVol. 17(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.