Corporate Sustainability Reporting – Between Politics and Reality

The paper explores key aspects, challenges, and opportunities related to corporate sustainability reporting within the context of the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). It critically analyzes the regulatory and political dynamics surrounding the CSRD implementation, emphasizing the significant changes proposed by the Omnibus package. These changes notably reduce the directive’s initial scope and impact, raising concerns about decreased transparency and accountability. The report identifies key issues, such as excessive bureaucratic burdens, frequent regulatory changes, insufficient time for businesses to adapt, and concerns about reduced transparency and accountability. The implications of the sharp decline in the number of companies required to report sustainability information are outlined from the perspective of comparability. The main thesis emphasizes that sustainability reporting must go beyond regulatory compliance, providing indicators that are prepared, adapted, comparable, traceable, and used in the same robust way as indicators from the main financial statements, enabling effective management decision-making and long-term corporate responsibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56065/accountcont/2025.153
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Sustainability Reporting – Between Politics and Reality

Атанас Атанасов
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Corporate Sustainability Reporting – Between Politics and Reality

Атанас Атанасов
article en

Abstract

The paper explores key aspects, challenges, and opportunities related to corporate sustainability reporting within the context of the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). It critically analyzes the regulatory and political dynamics surrounding the CSRD implementation, emphasizing the significant changes proposed by the Omnibus package. These changes notably reduce the directive’s initial scope and impact, raising concerns about decreased transparency and accountability. The report identifies key issues, such as excessive bureaucratic burdens, frequent regulatory changes, insufficient time for businesses to adapt, and concerns about reduced transparency and accountability. The implications of the sharp decline in the number of companies required to report sustainability information are outlined from the perspective of comparability. The main thesis emphasizes that sustainability reporting must go beyond regulatory compliance, providing indicators that are prepared, adapted, comparable, traceable, and used in the same robust way as indicators from the main financial statements, enabling effective management decision-making and long-term corporate responsibility.

Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corporate Sustainability Reporting – Between Politics and Reality — Атанас Атанасов · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS