Development of Functional Abilities Assessment in Paediatric Oncology (FAAP-O) Scale for Children and Adolescents Affected by Cancer

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Functional abilities are fundamental for social participation. However, functional abilities assessment tools validated for children and adolescents undergoing cancer treatment are lacking. A preliminary validation of the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) scale for children with cancer found that some items are unable to discriminate or distinguish between different gross motor function levels. This study aims to develop and validate the Functional Abilities Assessment in Paediatric Oncology (FAAP-O), starting with GMFM-88. <b>Methods</b>: This multicentre study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04862130) involved children and adolescents (6 months-18 years old) diagnosed with cancer, in any phase of treatment or less than 1 year off therapy. A multiphase mixed-methods design was employed. The content validity of each item of GMFM-88 for the paediatric oncology population was calculated with the Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Items with a CVR score ≥ 0.70 were included in the FAAP-O scale. Other items with a score between 0 and 0.69 were selected for their relevance by consensus with five focus groups and a plenary meeting. The FAAP-O items set was organised in five dimensions by exploratory factor analyses. The calculation of FAAP-O internal consistency was made using Cronbach's α while inter/intra-rater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). <b>Results</b>: The study involved 217 subjects. The FAAP-O included 36 items; its internal consistency was good in each dimension (0.90 ≤ α ≤ 0.96) and its inter/intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.90). <b>Conclusions</b>: A new specifically validated scale to assess functional abilities in children and adolescents with cancer is provided. Validated tools are necessary for specific, objective rehabilitation assessments, which are fundamental in clinical practice and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091163
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Functional Abilities Assessment in Paediatric Oncology (FAAP-O) Scale for Children and Adolescents Affected by Cancer

Lucia Longo, Antonio Trabacca, Michela Peranzoni, Margherita Cerboneschi et al.
Children
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Development of Functional Abilities Assessment in Paediatric Oncology (FAAP-O) Scale for Children and Adolescents Affected by Cancer

Lucia Longo, Antonio Trabacca, Michela Peranzoni, Margherita Cerboneschi, Roberto Casalaz, Mario Cardano, Federica Ricci, Chiara Pellegrini, Paola Imazio, Giovanni Galeoto, Morena Delle Fave, Marco Clari, Gabriella Naretto, G. Carlucci, Marco Rabusin, Nicoletta Orsini, Marta Cervo, Andrea Martinuzzi, Annalisa Cornelli, Daniele Panzeri, Francesca Rossi, Veronica Sciannameo, Franca Fagioli, Miriana Ferrarese, Paola Berchialla, Marco Tofani, Fabiola Picone, Annalisa Calcagno, Claudia Zigrino, Daniele Bertin, Maria Lorenzon, Monica Valle, Maria Esposito, Federica Nota
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Functional abilities are fundamental for social participation. However, functional abilities assessment tools validated for children and adolescents undergoing cancer treatment are lacking. A preliminary validation of the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) scale for children with cancer found that some items are unable to discriminate or distinguish between different gross motor function levels. This study aims to develop and validate the Functional Abilities Assessment in Paediatric Oncology (FAAP-O), starting with GMFM-88. <b>Methods</b>: This multicentre study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04862130) involved children and adolescents (6 months-18 years old) diagnosed with cancer, in any phase of treatment or less than 1 year off therapy. A multiphase mixed-methods design was employed. The content validity of each item of GMFM-88 for the paediatric oncology population was calculated with the Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Items with a CVR score ≥ 0.70 were included in the FAAP-O scale. Other items with a score between 0 and 0.69 were selected for their relevance by consensus with five focus groups and a plenary meeting. The FAAP-O items set was organised in five dimensions by exploratory factor analyses. The calculation of FAAP-O internal consistency was made using Cronbach's α while inter/intra-rater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). <b>Results</b>: The study involved 217 subjects. The FAAP-O included 36 items; its internal consistency was good in each dimension (0.90 ≤ α ≤ 0.96) and its inter/intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.90). <b>Conclusions</b>: A new specifically validated scale to assess functional abilities in children and adolescents with cancer is provided. Validated tools are necessary for specific, objective rehabilitation assessments, which are fundamental in clinical practice and research.

ChildrenVol. 12(9)
IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT), Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo (IT), Ospedale di Bolzano (IT), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), Meyer Children's Hospital (IT), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT), Ospedale Regina Margherita (IT), Children's Research Hospital (JP), IRCCS Eugenio Medea (IT), Department of Public Health (US), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), Link Campus University (IT), University of Turin (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.