Zwischen Klassen, gegen Klassen

Abstract I provide an account of class transition with reference to Bourdieu, Spinoza and Marx, building on essayistic work by contemporary French philosopher Chantal Jaquet. After clarifying the notion of class with Marx and Bourdieu, I sketch a Spinozist perspective of movements between classes. While Bourdieu registered such movements as exceptions, Jaquet explains them as rearrangements of affective, economic, political and socio-cultural determinants. She thereby pits Spinoza’s concept of ingenium against Bourdieu’s habitus figure. As I show, this expresses ontological and anthropological differences between both oeuvres. Spinoza’s understanding of affect , disposition and conatus , I argue, allows class reproduction to be grasped in its inherent instability. While Jaquet inherits Bourdieu’s struggle to account for the politics of whether the social refracts into classes (making class transition an issue in the first place), I suggest reconciling the analysis of class transitions with the critique of class relations by triangulating Spinoza and Bourdieu with Marx.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2025-0015
Primary Topic
Economic and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zwischen Klassen, gegen Klassen

Andrea C. Blättler
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Economic and Social Issues
article

Zwischen Klassen, gegen Klassen

Andrea C. Blättler
article en

Abstract

Abstract I provide an account of class transition with reference to Bourdieu, Spinoza and Marx, building on essayistic work by contemporary French philosopher Chantal Jaquet. After clarifying the notion of class with Marx and Bourdieu, I sketch a Spinozist perspective of movements between classes. While Bourdieu registered such movements as exceptions, Jaquet explains them as rearrangements of affective, economic, political and socio-cultural determinants. She thereby pits Spinoza’s concept of ingenium against Bourdieu’s habitus figure. As I show, this expresses ontological and anthropological differences between both oeuvres. Spinoza’s understanding of affect , disposition and conatus , I argue, allows class reproduction to be grasped in its inherent instability. While Jaquet inherits Bourdieu’s struggle to account for the politics of whether the social refracts into classes (making class transition an issue in the first place), I suggest reconciling the analysis of class transitions with the critique of class relations by triangulating Spinoza and Bourdieu with Marx.

Deutsche Zeitschrift für PhilosophieVol. 73(2)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Economic and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Zwischen Klassen, gegen Klassen — Andrea C. Blättler · Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS