The Beauty of Emptiness—The Foundational Root of Chinese Aesthetics

The article explores how the concept of “emptiness” (xu 虛) emerged as the defining aesthetic principle in the tradition of Chinese “literati painting” (wenrenhua 文人畫). Far from denoting absence or nothingness in the strict sense of the word, xu represents a dynamic and generative force—an underlying condition through which artistic form, meaning, and spiritual insight arise. Tracing its development from the Wei-Jin period (220–589 CE) onwards, the article examines how xu evolved at the intersection of Neo-Daoist metaphysics (Xuanxue 玄學) and Chan Buddhist philosophy, transforming from a metaphysical abstraction into a concrete aesthetic language. Focusing on five key figures—Gu Kaizhi, Zong Bing, Xie He, Jing Hao, and Shitao the study highlights how each articulated core aesthetic principles that grounded painting in the expressive possibilities of emptiness. Concepts such as liubai (留白, unpainted space), qiyun (氣韻, vital resonance of spirit), and yihua (一畫, the holistic or primordial brushstroke) demonstrate how emptiness manifests visually and philosophically. Ultimately, the article argues that xu is not only central to Chinese aesthetic theory, but serves as the silent generative force that animates the entire tradition of literati art.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Studies
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2025.13.3.71-93
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Visual Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Beauty of Emptiness—The Foundational Root of Chinese Aesthetics

Téa Sernelj
1 citations
Asian Studies
Digital Media and Visual Art
3.54
article

The Beauty of Emptiness—The Foundational Root of Chinese Aesthetics

Téa Sernelj
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article explores how the concept of “emptiness” (xu 虛) emerged as the defining aesthetic principle in the tradition of Chinese “literati painting” (wenrenhua 文人畫). Far from denoting absence or nothingness in the strict sense of the word, xu represents a dynamic and generative force—an underlying condition through which artistic form, meaning, and spiritual insight arise. Tracing its development from the Wei-Jin period (220–589 CE) onwards, the article examines how xu evolved at the intersection of Neo-Daoist metaphysics (Xuanxue 玄學) and Chan Buddhist philosophy, transforming from a metaphysical abstraction into a concrete aesthetic language. Focusing on five key figures—Gu Kaizhi, Zong Bing, Xie He, Jing Hao, and Shitao the study highlights how each articulated core aesthetic principles that grounded painting in the expressive possibilities of emptiness. Concepts such as liubai (留白, unpainted space), qiyun (氣韻, vital resonance of spirit), and yihua (一畫, the holistic or primordial brushstroke) demonstrate how emptiness manifests visually and philosophically. Ultimately, the article argues that xu is not only central to Chinese aesthetic theory, but serves as the silent generative force that animates the entire tradition of literati art.

Asian StudiesVol. 13(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Media and Visual Art
3.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Beauty of Emptiness—The Foundational Root of Chinese Aesthetics — Téa Sernelj · Asian Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS