Beyond Duality

This article explores the concept of “nothingness” in the Advaita Vedānta and Madhyamaka traditions of Indian Buddhism, analysing their convergences, divergences, and broader implications within Indian philosophical traditions. Both systems emphasize the transcendence of duality and the limitations of ordinary perception in realizing ultimate truth. For Advaita Vedānta, Brahman—the singular, eternal essence—is the sole reality, with the phenomenal world regarded as an illusion (māyā). Liberation arises through self-realization, where one recognizes the unity of self (atman) and Brahman. Conversely, Madhyamaka Buddhism denies the existence of any inherent essence, positing emptiness (Śūnyatā) as the nature of all phenomena. Liberation in this framework involves the cessation of clinging and the realization of interdependence. The article contextualizes these philosophies within their socio-cultural milieus, revealing how their metaphysical claims respond to existential and ethical concerns. While Advaita seeks to unify diversity through non-dualism, Madhyamaka challenges rigid constructs, emphasizing relational existence. Comparative analysis highlights shared principles, such as the critique of ego-based delusion and the transformative power of wisdom, alongside distinct soteriological paths rooted in their metaphysical differences. By engaging with these traditions, the article not only underscores their philosophical richness, but also explores their relevance to contemporary issues, including existential anxiety and ethical dilemmas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Studies
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2025.13.3.213-243
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Duality

Pankaj Vaishnav
Asian Studies
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Beyond Duality

Pankaj Vaishnav
article en

Abstract

This article explores the concept of “nothingness” in the Advaita Vedānta and Madhyamaka traditions of Indian Buddhism, analysing their convergences, divergences, and broader implications within Indian philosophical traditions. Both systems emphasize the transcendence of duality and the limitations of ordinary perception in realizing ultimate truth. For Advaita Vedānta, Brahman—the singular, eternal essence—is the sole reality, with the phenomenal world regarded as an illusion (māyā). Liberation arises through self-realization, where one recognizes the unity of self (atman) and Brahman. Conversely, Madhyamaka Buddhism denies the existence of any inherent essence, positing emptiness (Śūnyatā) as the nature of all phenomena. Liberation in this framework involves the cessation of clinging and the realization of interdependence. The article contextualizes these philosophies within their socio-cultural milieus, revealing how their metaphysical claims respond to existential and ethical concerns. While Advaita seeks to unify diversity through non-dualism, Madhyamaka challenges rigid constructs, emphasizing relational existence. Comparative analysis highlights shared principles, such as the critique of ego-based delusion and the transformative power of wisdom, alongside distinct soteriological paths rooted in their metaphysical differences. By engaging with these traditions, the article not only underscores their philosophical richness, but also explores their relevance to contemporary issues, including existential anxiety and ethical dilemmas.

Asian StudiesVol. 13(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.