<i>Mu</i> 無 as Structural Ground

This paper re-examines Saussure’s structuralism through Nishida Kitarō’s logic of basho (basho teki ronri 場所的論理), a philosophical theory rooted in the concept of mu 無. By adopting this perspective, we explore the foundation of linguistic structure while seeking to transcend its perceived closure and stasis—key critiques of Saussure’s theory. We propose interpreting Saussure’s synchronicity within the framework of diachronicity. The principle of arbitrariness, in this light, emerges as a trace of diachronic contingency fossilized within a synchronic system. Linguistic structure operates through two interwoven dimensions: synchronically, it manifests as oppositional relations among signs, described by Saussure as “negativity”, embodying mu as negative dialectics; diachronically, it is shaped by historical contingency, reflected in the arbitrary combination of sound-images and concepts, mirroring mu as the “groundless ground”. This “groundless ground”, as the “basho of absolute mu” (zettaimu no basho 絶対無の場所), reveals language not as a static system but as a dynamic process of systemic becoming, akin to what Nishida terms the “eternal now” (eien no ima 永遠の今), which continuously maintains itself in the tension between past and future. Synchronic structure is thus not a frozen moment but a dynamic threshold where historical accidents crystallize into present configurations, perpetually open to reconfiguration. It is both complete (as a system of differential relations) and incomplete (as a site of perpetual reconfiguration).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Studies
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2025.13.3.53-68
Primary Topic
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mu 無 as Structural Ground

Xiaobo Yang
Asian Studies
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
article

Mu 無 as Structural Ground

Xiaobo Yang
article en

Abstract

This paper re-examines Saussure’s structuralism through Nishida Kitarō’s logic of basho (basho teki ronri 場所的論理), a philosophical theory rooted in the concept of mu 無. By adopting this perspective, we explore the foundation of linguistic structure while seeking to transcend its perceived closure and stasis—key critiques of Saussure’s theory. We propose interpreting Saussure’s synchronicity within the framework of diachronicity. The principle of arbitrariness, in this light, emerges as a trace of diachronic contingency fossilized within a synchronic system. Linguistic structure operates through two interwoven dimensions: synchronically, it manifests as oppositional relations among signs, described by Saussure as “negativity”, embodying mu as negative dialectics; diachronically, it is shaped by historical contingency, reflected in the arbitrary combination of sound-images and concepts, mirroring mu as the “groundless ground”. This “groundless ground”, as the “basho of absolute mu” (zettaimu no basho 絶対無の場所), reveals language not as a static system but as a dynamic process of systemic becoming, akin to what Nishida terms the “eternal now” (eien no ima 永遠の今), which continuously maintains itself in the tension between past and future. Synchronic structure is thus not a frozen moment but a dynamic threshold where historical accidents crystallize into present configurations, perpetually open to reconfiguration. It is both complete (as a system of differential relations) and incomplete (as a site of perpetual reconfiguration).

Asian StudiesVol. 13(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.