Developing and evaluating a Bayesian weather generator for UK precipitation conditioned on discrete storm types

Abstract. Weather generators (WGs) are important tools for downscaling General Circulation Model (GCM) output for climate impact modelling. This study introduces a precipitation WG conditioned on a recent storm types dataset and outlines a methodology for evaluating WGs using proper scoring rules. The storm types are a set of discrete weather types that use atmospheric variables to categorise ERA5 grid cells into fronts, cyclones and thunderstorms or combinations of these. The WG is a Bayesian Generalised Linear Model (GLM) with vertical velocity and humidity as covariates, conditioned on the storm types, and trained on 6 hourly precipitation accumulations. This approach contrasts with previous WGs based on weather types, which use clustering methods such as k-means to generate weather types. A Bayesian model framework is used, instead of typical maximum likelihood approaches, and an informed prior choice is made on observable quantities using the prior predictive distribution. The WG is assessed using proper scoring rules and Diebold-Mariano (DM) significance tests. The use of a DM test to assess the statistical significance of average proper score differences is a key addition to typical WG evaluation approaches, as it helps model developers avoid changes that improve an average score by chance. Calibration is assessed using the probability integral transform histogram and by comparing draws from the posterior predictive distribution to observations. Compared to the same WG not conditioned on storm types the inclusion of storm types improved the average Continuous Ranked Probably Score (CRPS) by a statistically significant amount across the stations considered. When storm types are used as an alternative to continuous atmospheric variables, they provide 33 % of the improvement in average CRPS that the atmospheric variables do, averaged over the stations. To quantify the WG's ability to represent extremes the threshold weighted CRPS (twCRPS) is explored. For three different thresholds the twCRPS corroborates the results for the CRPS. The use of proper scoring rules in conjunction with a DM test is highlighted as a powerful tool for assessing WG skill.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4110
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and evaluating a Bayesian weather generator for UK precipitation conditioned on discrete storm types

Jennifer L. Catto, Anne Jones, Stefan Siegert, Paul Bell
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

Developing and evaluating a Bayesian weather generator for UK precipitation conditioned on discrete storm types

Jennifer L. Catto, Anne Jones, Stefan Siegert, Paul Bell
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Weather generators (WGs) are important tools for downscaling General Circulation Model (GCM) output for climate impact modelling. This study introduces a precipitation WG conditioned on a recent storm types dataset and outlines a methodology for evaluating WGs using proper scoring rules. The storm types are a set of discrete weather types that use atmospheric variables to categorise ERA5 grid cells into fronts, cyclones and thunderstorms or combinations of these. The WG is a Bayesian Generalised Linear Model (GLM) with vertical velocity and humidity as covariates, conditioned on the storm types, and trained on 6 hourly precipitation accumulations. This approach contrasts with previous WGs based on weather types, which use clustering methods such as k-means to generate weather types. A Bayesian model framework is used, instead of typical maximum likelihood approaches, and an informed prior choice is made on observable quantities using the prior predictive distribution. The WG is assessed using proper scoring rules and Diebold-Mariano (DM) significance tests. The use of a DM test to assess the statistical significance of average proper score differences is a key addition to typical WG evaluation approaches, as it helps model developers avoid changes that improve an average score by chance. Calibration is assessed using the probability integral transform histogram and by comparing draws from the posterior predictive distribution to observations. Compared to the same WG not conditioned on storm types the inclusion of storm types improved the average Continuous Ranked Probably Score (CRPS) by a statistically significant amount across the stations considered. When storm types are used as an alternative to continuous atmospheric variables, they provide 33 % of the improvement in average CRPS that the atmospheric variables do, averaged over the stations. To quantify the WG's ability to represent extremes the threshold weighted CRPS (twCRPS) is explored. For three different thresholds the twCRPS corroborates the results for the CRPS. The use of proper scoring rules in conjunction with a DM test is highlighted as a powerful tool for assessing WG skill.

University of Exeter (GB), Daresbury Laboratory (GB), Sci-Tech Daresbury (GB)
Met Office, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.