Decision-Making About Potentially Non-Beneficial Intensive Care Unit Treatments: Interviews of Family Members from an Academic Public Hospital

ObjectiveDeveloping effective strategies to improve shared decision-making (SDM) about potentially non-beneficial intensive care unit (ICU) treatments for patients with advanced medical illness requires understanding patients' and family members' perspectives. This study explores family members' experiences in discussing potentially non-beneficial treatments with ICU clinicians to identify factors that influenced their decision-making.MethodsSemi-structured interviews of pre-dominantly non-White family members making decisions about potentially non-beneficial ICU treatments were conducted in the medical ICU of an academic public hospital in Los Angeles County. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsEighteen surrogate decision-makers were interviewed for this study. Perceived barriers to decision-making included intimidation, dehumanizing family meetings, time-pressure to make decisions, and uncertainty of benefit from ICU treatments. Factors that affected the perceived susceptibility from harm or likelihood of benefit from invasive treatments included health status prior to hospitalization, physicians' discussion of prognoses, and direct observation of clinical status during ICU hospitalization. Greater self-efficacy in making decisions was promoted by stronger family support, gaining experience with the clinical situation, and empathic characteristics of the clinical team.ConclusionsInterviews with family members at a single ICU revealed that strategies to improve decision-making may include emphasizing empathic communication styles that focus on patients' values and preferences for care, reducing time-pressure and uncertainty by seeing the effects of ICU treatments, and creating time for families to adjust and seek social support. Adopting this approach may allow ICU clinicians and family members to become more aligned in their efforts to provide compassionate care for patients while minimizing non-beneficial treatments. These findings need to be validated in larger patient populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251371579
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-Making About Potentially Non-Beneficial Intensive Care Unit Treatments: Interviews of Family Members from an Academic Public Hospital

Thanh H. Neville, Derjung M. Tarn, Dong Chang, Jennifer Parrish
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Decision-Making About Potentially Non-Beneficial Intensive Care Unit Treatments: Interviews of Family Members from an Academic Public Hospital

Thanh H. Neville, Derjung M. Tarn, Dong Chang, Jennifer Parrish
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveDeveloping effective strategies to improve shared decision-making (SDM) about potentially non-beneficial intensive care unit (ICU) treatments for patients with advanced medical illness requires understanding patients' and family members' perspectives. This study explores family members' experiences in discussing potentially non-beneficial treatments with ICU clinicians to identify factors that influenced their decision-making.MethodsSemi-structured interviews of pre-dominantly non-White family members making decisions about potentially non-beneficial ICU treatments were conducted in the medical ICU of an academic public hospital in Los Angeles County. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsEighteen surrogate decision-makers were interviewed for this study. Perceived barriers to decision-making included intimidation, dehumanizing family meetings, time-pressure to make decisions, and uncertainty of benefit from ICU treatments. Factors that affected the perceived susceptibility from harm or likelihood of benefit from invasive treatments included health status prior to hospitalization, physicians' discussion of prognoses, and direct observation of clinical status during ICU hospitalization. Greater self-efficacy in making decisions was promoted by stronger family support, gaining experience with the clinical situation, and empathic characteristics of the clinical team.ConclusionsInterviews with family members at a single ICU revealed that strategies to improve decision-making may include emphasizing empathic communication styles that focus on patients' values and preferences for care, reducing time-pressure and uncertainty by seeing the effects of ICU treatments, and creating time for families to adjust and seek social support. Adopting this approach may allow ICU clinicians and family members to become more aligned in their efforts to provide compassionate care for patients while minimizing non-beneficial treatments. These findings need to be validated in larger patient populations.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
University of Southern California (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center (US), UCLA Medical Center (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US), Good Samaritan Hospital (US)
California Health Care Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.