The Factor Structure of Intimate Partner Violence Risk

To improve our understanding of the latent constructs of intimate partner violence (IPV) risk, we explored the underlying factor structure of combined items from three IPV risk assessment tools and examined whether the factors predict recidivism outcomes. Data were examined for 251 adult men who were charged with violence against their past or current female intimate partners and whose files were referred for a comprehensive threat assessment from 2010 to 2016 in Canada. Results suggested six underlying risk factors, two of which significantly predicted IPV, any violent, and any recidivism outcomes in a 4-year average follow-up with 227 men. However, only one factor (<i>Antisocial Patterns and Psychosocial Adjustment</i>) independently predicted IPV and any violent recidivism over time above and beyond other factors. Our findings indicate room to further improve current IPV risk assessment measures and support the call for informative causal theories of IPV recidivism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548251357789
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Factor Structure of Intimate Partner Violence Risk

Liam Ennis, Kevin L. Nunes, Anna Pham, N. Zoe Hilton et al.
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

The Factor Structure of Intimate Partner Violence Risk

Liam Ennis, Kevin L. Nunes, Anna Pham, N. Zoe Hilton, Sandy Y. Jung
article en

Abstract

To improve our understanding of the latent constructs of intimate partner violence (IPV) risk, we explored the underlying factor structure of combined items from three IPV risk assessment tools and examined whether the factors predict recidivism outcomes. Data were examined for 251 adult men who were charged with violence against their past or current female intimate partners and whose files were referred for a comprehensive threat assessment from 2010 to 2016 in Canada. Results suggested six underlying risk factors, two of which significantly predicted IPV, any violent, and any recidivism outcomes in a 4-year average follow-up with 227 men. However, only one factor (<i>Antisocial Patterns and Psychosocial Adjustment</i>) independently predicted IPV and any violent recidivism over time above and beyond other factors. Our findings indicate room to further improve current IPV risk assessment measures and support the call for informative causal theories of IPV recidivism.

Criminal Justice and BehaviorVol. 53(1)
University of Alberta (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Carleton University (CA), MacEwan University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.