'What Difference Will That Make?’ – Contracting More Collaboratively in Solution-Focused Brief Therapy
Solution-focused (SF) therapists often advise that if a client requests particular therapeutic processes then therapists should redirect the conversation towards outcomes. If the client hasn’t yet consented to SF therapeutic processes – or has requested different processes – then controlling the conversation in such a manner could be described as an act of dominance and could be counter-therapeutic. Alternatively, responding to the request would demonstrate respect. Research suggests involving clients in decisions about their therapy has clinical benefits.
Authors
- David Blowers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-6608)
Institutions
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- Metanoia Institute (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of solution-focused brief therapy
- Published
- 2025-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.59874/001c.142789
- Primary Topic
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00