Evaluation of Stability and Survival Rates of Short vs Standard Implants in Posterior Mandible: A Prospective Clinical Trial

surpassed by the replacement of partially edentulous arches with short-term implants, thereby increasing the morbidity postoperatively and reducing the risk of complications as well.So, as an alternative to these surgical procedures, short implants have been developed to replace natural teeth in atrophic ridges. 1,5n the available implant literature, as of today, various authors have defined short dental implants, as per their criteria, wherein some consider 10 mm as short, while others consider <6 mm as short. 1,6 IntroductIonDental implants have emerged as the most predictable means of replacing lost teeth, with the primary goal of oral rehabilitation to improve the patient's quality of life, thereby enhancing the functions and esthetics of the stomatognathic system.Edentulism in the posterior mandible often limits patients' ability to perform daily routines and also plays a significant role in their functional activity. 1Although many treatment modalities, such as fixed partial dentures and removable partial dentures, have existed since time immemorial in dentistry, implants, which are a much recent innovation, do play a significant role in replacing natural teeth because of their high survival rates, thereby ensuring enhanced function and psychological comfort to the patient. [2][3]3][4] Following extraction, the bony socket usually undergoes many dimensional changes.These horizontal and vertical changes in bone urge the clinicians in routine practice to rely on several surgical techniques, such as GBR (guided bone regeneration), ridge augmentation procedures, and nerve transposition, in order to attain adequate bone volume so that standard implants can be placed. 1Moreover, these surgical procedures are not only technically sensitive but also subjected to postoperative complications, such as pain in the surgical site, graft resorption, and neurosensory disturbances, thereby affecting the compliance of the patient. 5ugmentation of bone vertically, which is usually associated with higher financial costs and prolonged treatment time, is 1,2,4-

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Dentistry
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2688
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Stability and Survival Rates of Short vs Standard Implants in Posterior Mandible: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Lahari Karuturi, Mantena Satyanarayana Raju, Sruthima NVS Gottumukkala, Inti Srividya et al.
World Journal of Dentistry
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Evaluation of Stability and Survival Rates of Short vs Standard Implants in Posterior Mandible: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Lahari Karuturi, Mantena Satyanarayana Raju, Sruthima NVS Gottumukkala, Inti Srividya, Gautami S Penmetsa, Konathala SV Ramesh, Mohan KP
article en

Abstract

surpassed by the replacement of partially edentulous arches with short-term implants, thereby increasing the morbidity postoperatively and reducing the risk of complications as well.So, as an alternative to these surgical procedures, short implants have been developed to replace natural teeth in atrophic ridges. 1,5n the available implant literature, as of today, various authors have defined short dental implants, as per their criteria, wherein some consider 10 mm as short, while others consider <6 mm as short. 1,6 IntroductIonDental implants have emerged as the most predictable means of replacing lost teeth, with the primary goal of oral rehabilitation to improve the patient's quality of life, thereby enhancing the functions and esthetics of the stomatognathic system.Edentulism in the posterior mandible often limits patients' ability to perform daily routines and also plays a significant role in their functional activity. 1Although many treatment modalities, such as fixed partial dentures and removable partial dentures, have existed since time immemorial in dentistry, implants, which are a much recent innovation, do play a significant role in replacing natural teeth because of their high survival rates, thereby ensuring enhanced function and psychological comfort to the patient. [2][3]3][4] Following extraction, the bony socket usually undergoes many dimensional changes.These horizontal and vertical changes in bone urge the clinicians in routine practice to rely on several surgical techniques, such as GBR (guided bone regeneration), ridge augmentation procedures, and nerve transposition, in order to attain adequate bone volume so that standard implants can be placed. 1Moreover, these surgical procedures are not only technically sensitive but also subjected to postoperative complications, such as pain in the surgical site, graft resorption, and neurosensory disturbances, thereby affecting the compliance of the patient. 5ugmentation of bone vertically, which is usually associated with higher financial costs and prolonged treatment time, is 1,2,4-

World Journal of DentistryVol. 16(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.