Why AI Cannot Be an Agent of Equality: A Critique of Technological Utopianism and the Category Error of Algorithmic Justice

This paper presents a critique of the argument that artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to overcome social hierarchies and achieve equality. It contends that this position is misguided insofar as it commits a category error by confusing epistemic automatism with moral agency. This study challenges the separation of instrumental and moral rationality, as well as formal and substantive equality, to demonstrate how, despite popular imagination and representations of neutrality, AI functions to reify existing hierarchical systems while obscuring the range of human choices made about its design and deployment. The idea of AI as a leveler is a secular feat of metaphysical illusion in the tradition that Nietzsche criticized: projecting justice onto a bodiless future of technology. The paper argues that algorithmic optimization cannot replace normative judgment, ethical deliberation, and political action, which are necessary for true equality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emerging Media
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543251373105
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why AI Cannot Be an Agent of Equality: A Critique of Technological Utopianism and the Category Error of Algorithmic Justice

Amitabh Vikram Dwivedi
Emerging Media
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Why AI Cannot Be an Agent of Equality: A Critique of Technological Utopianism and the Category Error of Algorithmic Justice

Amitabh Vikram Dwivedi
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a critique of the argument that artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to overcome social hierarchies and achieve equality. It contends that this position is misguided insofar as it commits a category error by confusing epistemic automatism with moral agency. This study challenges the separation of instrumental and moral rationality, as well as formal and substantive equality, to demonstrate how, despite popular imagination and representations of neutrality, AI functions to reify existing hierarchical systems while obscuring the range of human choices made about its design and deployment. The idea of AI as a leveler is a secular feat of metaphysical illusion in the tradition that Nietzsche criticized: projecting justice onto a bodiless future of technology. The paper argues that algorithmic optimization cannot replace normative judgment, ethical deliberation, and political action, which are necessary for true equality.

Emerging MediaVol. 3(3)
Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.